Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

What's more comfortable about SUV or a truck than a minivan or combi?

How is a tall hood increasing your family comfort? It only increases your ego.

 help



I spent significant time recently in both a new F150 and a Toyota Sienna, and it isn't even close in the comfort between them. F150 wins by a mile by the sheer amount of space you have in that thing for both passengers and cargo. Not to mention the ability to tow.

Precisely zero of that interior space is under the hood.

The amount of space in the frunk of the F150 lightning is amazing. Such a shame they stopped making them.

> F150 wins by a mile by the sheer amount of space you have in that thing for both passengers

How much leg room does the third row have in that F150? I don't think the seats for the sixth and seventh passengers are quite comfortable.

How are the footrests on the second row? Are those Captains chairs on the second row or a rigid bench with no reclining at all? When you talk about how comfortable it is, are you saying that as all the passengers (all 6-7) or just you as the driver?

Are you comfortable letting a three year old operate the doors without damaging other cars around them and climb in and out of that F-150 on their own? My young kids manage the sliding doors just fine, their ability to largely do it on their own and the ease of access of the sliding door makes it a lot more comfortable getting them in and out. In fact, I can open the doors safely before they even reach the car. That's pretty dang comfortable.

> Not to mention the ability to tow.

The thing everyone imagines they'll do all the time but in practice practically never do.


How often people tow anything?

Is this a serious question? A lot of people tow stuff all the time for work, home improvement, or recreation. Not everyone is a city dweller living in a small apartment whose only options to spend their free time is picking which restaurant to eat dinner at.

People in Europe tow stuff with 120 HP sedans or combis all the time. Driving a vehicle that you can't park, that's unsafe for pedestrians and burns 50% more every day just so you can tow something marginally easier on these 2 occassions a year when you need to tow something larger than a 500kg trailer makes 0 sense.

And if we're talking businesses, building crews etc. - this is what they actually need: https://img.linemedia.com/img/s/flatbed-truck-3-5t-Volkswage...

Or just a regular van more likely, cause rain is a thing.

VW crafter with dual cab uses 57% of its length for the flatbed, largest F150 - 39%. Notice how the engine fits into this tiny vedge-shaped hood.

https://i.imgur.com/KopGeTi.png

Same idea as American trucks, more cargo space, higher usable load, can be loaded from all sides, completely flat bed, no wheel cutouts, fits 6 people inside, burns less fuel. All because there's no ridiculously huge hood, wheels and engine.

Let's be honest here. American pickup trucks are not about the usability, they are about ego.


Yeah. All those accountants and software developers and doctors and insurance salespeople and marketing people and what not gotta tow for work all the time.

Very few jobs require people to tow with their personal daily driver all the time.

> Not everyone is a city dweller

And yet a ton of these city dwellers do drive around in these giant lifted trucks.

It's also incredible to me you can't actually imagine any hobbies that don't require driving a giant pickup truck around. It's just so overly ingrained into your identity. As if it requires a giant pickup truck to go fishing or go to a sports field or go camping or whatever.


Plenty of minivans also have tall hoods. I assume by combi you're talking about a station wagon, and in that case you're trading cargo capacity and the ability to tow boats / trailers / campers / etc... Ego has nothing to do with it - utility does. You can fit more people and things in a larger vehicle, this isn't rocket science.

I don't think the cargo capacity argument really holds water. I drive a Volvo V60 wagon which has trunk space of 23.2 cubic feet. When it was in the shop, I had a loaner XC60, and I could noticeably feel that the trunk space was about the same, despite the vehicle sitting considerably taller.

Sure enough, the XC60 crossover has a trunk space of 22.4 cubic feet.

It's the same trunk, just higher off the ground, which to me makes it less useful to me: more lifting to get stuff in, harder to rummage through items (eg camping pantry), much more difficult to access my roof box.


Which ones? Caravan's, Sienna's, etc all have significantly lower hood heights than a typical 3 row SUV.

They all have sloping hoods. A sloping hood increases visibility and reduces air resistance.

Why does a Kenworth have a sloping hood but F-150's and SUV's don't?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: