The search engine would return only those aspects of evolution that are known to be almost certainly true. See for example this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TUxLR9hdorI
Newton's laws are not truth but merely an approximation that suffices in most cases.
That Newton's Laws are not "truth" is exactly my point. I kind of set you up for that one, sorry.
Programmers and technicians deal in booleans -- yes or no answers. I know a couple of times I've heard people around here get frustrated when we start talking about the meanings of words. They just want simple declarative statements: evolution is true, detractors are wrong. Global Warming is true, detractors are wrong. etc.
Analysts, or people who have to translate from human languages to programming on a regular basis, understand that truth is such a slippery concept as to be almost meaningless. I can have three people in a room and have them discuss what a program is going to do until everybody is happy, and then still there are misunderstandings. Language is just too slippery for universal truth operations.
Or put another way, save universal truth for the philosophers.
Newton's laws are not truth but merely an approximation that suffices in most cases.