Politicians, non-profits, charities, and the like all typically argue that in order to get the best talent for the job, they have to offer competitive enough rates to ensure they even get a look-in compared to big companies.
There is an argument (not saying it is the right one) that there are substantial risks associated with reporting criminals, and there can be substantial benefits to working with them instead. So surely any rate has to be high enough to ensure it is considered an option?
Of course, that then gives the question - what is that lower bound?
There is an argument (not saying it is the right one) that there are substantial risks associated with reporting criminals, and there can be substantial benefits to working with them instead. So surely any rate has to be high enough to ensure it is considered an option?
Of course, that then gives the question - what is that lower bound?