Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I understand k-cups are convenient, but a "super-automatic" espresso machine has much cheaper consumables, and far superior results, measured in KLoCs. The only difference in operation is that you have to empty the grounds.

Or if a machine seems too troublesome, Starbucks sells single cup packets that work without a machine.

The k-cup machines seem like the thinnest premise for creating an ink-cartridge business model.



> The k-cup machines seem like the thinnest premise for creating an ink-cartridge business model.

And this is why I moved to using a reusable k-cup at home (when I don't have the time/desire to make a full pot)


I KNEW someone would say that.

How is that more convenient than a one-cup filter cone? I must be missing something that's really attractive about the k-cup machines.


1) They're well designed. Industrial design is important, as the rise of Ultrabooks and Apple has shown.

2) They have a fairly high end but affordable brand name. You either have a coffee maker or you have a Keurig.

3) It makes it convenient to try new flavors. My drip coffee machine won't make me a chai latte or hot cider at the touch of a button. My Keurig can, while also providing me with good coffee from a reusable k-cup.

4) Marketing makes sure they're everywhere and everyone has access to them.


Good variety, virtually no cleanup, no measuring of coffee. Not the cheapest option, or the best tasting coffee, but a great solution for me.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: