There isn't one. He could publish it if he wanted to. He just doesn't want to. That page is ancient. And none of this has anything to do with this story.
I don't think you know what you're talking about. There are much more comprehensive US academic crypto resources than Bernstein's old page. Researchers routinely publish crypto research. The page you're pointing to is an artifact of '90s crypto policy.
I know enough to know it requires years of study to participate with "...Researchers routinely publish crypto research." For many of us on HN, including myself, what is more valuable is what is canonical textbook and more accessible. I would welcome being facile in '90s crypto policy'.
It's saying roughly "I know enough to know that it takes years of study before you can read research papers in crypto. I am happy just to read canonical textbook resources, even if they are from the 90s"
I think you could have tried a little bit harder to understand it before posting. Obviously English wasn't the author's first language and there's a risk that the author might perceive an insult to his English language skills. It's really nice that HN is a discussion between people with a wide variety of native languages as I'm certain you'd agree.
