Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> A majority (but not a large majority) of cryptography engineers would use hybrids at this point

Actually, based on the WGLC, or the three of them rather, it's pretty clear that Ph.D cryptographers significantly prefer hybrid over pure ML-KEM.

> he'd much rather you believe he's arguing for hybrids against people who are trying to exterminate hybrids.

The brigade by the NSA (6+ votes or more if you include NSA contractors), the AD being former NSA and the moderation of Dr. Bernstein for a footnote seems pretty fair and balanced </sic>.

Meanwhile, the lead of the EU PQC program, professors from several universities, Ph.Ds and, additionally, legendary cryptographers all expressed significant concern and even stronger opposition to the publishing of the draft.

Finally, the chairs refused to share their methodology in determining consensus when asked by several Professors and Ph.Ds.



The legendary cryptographer that isn't Orr Dunkelman that you're referring to would be...?

What's noteworthy about the last list of sponsors of his position that Dan Bernstein posted was how few of them were cryptographers.


> Orr Dunkelman

The great Dr. Orr Dunkelman was admirably vocal in his opposition to the publishing of this draft.


That's why I brought him up. Now, because you used the plural, I'd like to know the other "legendary cryptographer" to which your comment refers.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: