It very obviously is. You went from using normal-person quotation marks to fitted quotes in the span of one message, you have a Unicode multiplication dot, and things like
Again, this is not “subjective.” It’s what actually happens
This isn’t a subjective opinion. It’s just how discounted cashflow works.
You can argue about the ethics if you want. But the financial comparison isn’t ambiguous.
Your paste doesn't even use a normal keyboard minus sign:
|nue) ... cost. S|
Another tell is how much of the quote isn't responsive to the whole thread context, just Hearn's immediate message. I'll add that it doesn't even manage to rebut Hearn!
(Feel free to compare this to your own writing style to get some clarity for what to fix up next time before pasting LLM output).
In case you were typing while I updated this, the first version of this comment didn't notice your minus sign, but it stuck out to me and when I checked it was so funny you used an en-dash I couldn't not include it.
