Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

It’s not about testing ability to solve those problems, it’s about testing conformity, determination, and IQ (while being job-specific and thus legal).





It's about conformity.

Every place that tested leetcode in my interview (easy/mediums) never impressed me with their work culture. Usually it's a proxy test for obedience and/or accepting bureaucracy.

Also forget about career advancement. (Why would we promote you when we can replace you with another code puzzle solver?)


IQ tests aren't illegal. Several big companies overtly use them.

AFAIK Hasn’t been legal unless the test is closely related to the job since Griggs v. Duke Power Company, a 1971 SCOTUS case.

You can just go look this up with IQ test vendors; you don't have to derive it axiomatically. They proudly list their (large) clients.

You need to ensure that the test doesn't discriminate on the basis of a protected characteristic though.

These are just completely bog-standard cognitive aptitude tests; in fact, they are if anything less rigorous than a modern IQ test. They're generally not specialized to specific jobs. You can read Reddit threads about people taking (and studying for) them.

Don't get me wrong: I think this is an incredibly dumb practice. But there's a mythology that IQ testing is a super-effective tool for recruiting that has been suppressed by anti-discrimination law. That is not the case. Most companies don't use IQ tests, because they're not fit for purpose.


It really really depends. If you're gonna train junior people then IQ tests are great, otherwise work sample tests are better.

It definitely is true that IQ tests are used less in the US because of prior case law though.


You mean they're selecting for lower IQ? (higher candidates will avoid the leetcode jobs)



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: