Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I showed my wife (who runs a riding academy) a picture of a pretty Chinese girl holding a horse somewhere near the mountains in the West of China and the first thing she noticed was that they'd put the halter on wrong.

I was impressed with how AIs would draw individual stitches on clothes but a seamstress friend of mine shook her head and pointed out how they also got it wrong.




I don't really know anatomy but I'm exposed to anatomy through dance and body work a fair amount. It's not just the fingers but any part of the bodies that AI draws that look wrong to me - if I look carefully.

I don't think you necessarily need to be an expert to see the multiple wrongnesses of AI images. It's just that AI images don't signal people to look more closely. (and a lot of popular illustration has bad anatomy and people excuse that).

And broadly, I think the division between experts and non-experts in the "telling things are wrong" department is over-emphasized by focus-example chosen in the article. The production of pop-songs, for example, is an area where an expert can make a song more appealing to the average person (objectively verifiable: they create top-ten hits). So the average person can tell a song is well/badly produced when they aren't an expert who can produce songs.


You can't learn to be a good figure artist by looking at flat images, you have to study anatomy, look at skeletons, learn the names of major and minor muscles and otherwise know what's inside. 3-d animated characters in games are good because this knowledge is baked into them.


I spent a really limited amount of time in stalls (mainly because my sister was really into horses and sometimes they let me ride the small ones) but I seem to recall at one point someone talking about halters and how both people and horses have different preferences for how it should be put on, and it also depends on the style/type of halter. Maybe I misremember completely, but doesn't feel too out of place that they'd have different preferences and ways of doing things if you're comparing Eastern ways and Western ways.


Presumably it was 'wrong' in that it was placed in a way that wouldn't work at all, IE objectively wrong not just subjectively wrong.


Specifically one of the straps was twisted 180 degrees before it was clipped on.

It certainly looks wrong although I don't imagine it creates distress for the horse.


Yeah, and even no halter. No offense to the parent commenter, but things like dressage are driven by defining "right" and "wrong", in order to create an in-group and out-group, and not necessarily to create better riders. You can ride a horse bare back, and in some cases, it really is better than with a saddle (and other accoutrement).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: