Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

We ALSO need nuclear to achieve the plan ending fossil fuels usage BUT nuclear do not means just build an NPP and mine uranium, it al means exaust disposal and also mean a spread and distributed energy grid as we need today, something we will probably be unable to maintain in a changing world.

Solar on contrary means "just" install some panels and batteries with relevant inverters and you have energy, at least a bit for a potentially inconstant time. p.v. + storage means quickness and small distributed scale, nuclear means slow and big. Here the issue:

- we need MUCH MORE nuclear, but it took some decades to build it

- we need to being able to adapt in a changing world where populations will move en masse and keep moving for a little while, with wars and so on

Long story short we might be late for nuclear, at least in the current state of available tech today (small reactors are a promise, but economically are a failure today) and we are too far from good enough energy storage for renewables.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: