I was trying myself to come up with a title that didn't editorialize the words Beeper or Apple into it but was still catchy enough to hit the front page. But I didn't come up with anything. If some journalists write articles about it with catchy titles then maybe those will pop up here.
Surely there are always problems in the market, but this post seems too close a match to the Beeper situation in both timing and wording to be a coincidence, especially considering the legislative attention it has already attracted. Which other recent "claims that competition must be impeded to advance privacy or security" might have prompted this post?
