It's called the breadwinner model. It's followed by many diverse cultures. There are a few exceptions that certain groups with certain interests have over promoted but the generality is the breadwinner model.
The consistent pattern is really really shitty links.
Modern Chinese wives in the US has F-All to do with traditional farming or Hunter Gatherers.
Home school essays submitted that outline the writers own particular bias are not exactly peak Histographic study.
An essay on Mayan division of labor does not undercut the reality that there's a ton of work to do and it gets split up (see my closing point), it actually reinforces it.
To reiterate - woman work just as hard as men in traditional farming and hunter gatherer lifestyles and your wealth of links don't run counter to that statement.
It's not to your credit that you attempt to bludgeon yor way through with a mass of links in the hope that no one will look closely.
Modern Chinese wives in the US have 100 percent "fuck all" to do with the topic at hand which is traditional gender roles. Would you like me to dig deeper and find gender roles in modern china and ancient china? Same pattern bro.
Bro that's just one mistaken link is an essay and the essay is right. For godsakes it's Afghanistan. Muslims. One of the very cultures who pushes gender roles to the extreme and you just decided to attack that point lol.
I can find tons more because this pattern is real. Just a simple search yields so many results across so many cultures. Rather then attack the weakest link in an obvious agenda based strategy you should address the overall point at hand in good faith discussion. It's like I present to you 10 links and you dismiss the whole thing because one was an "essay" give me a break.
I never said women don't work as hard as men don't put words in my mouth. But the roles of what men and women do generally have clear delineation.
>It's not to your credit that you attempt to bludgeon yor way through with a mass of links in the hope that no one will look closely.
It's not because I didn't do this. All I did was do a quick search to prove your obviously wrong point wrong with sources.
It's not to your credit to provoke such an accusatory and targeted attack.
You say I hope you wouldn't look to closely... well you looked closely and took 2 minor and miniscule details and constructed a full fledged baseless counter attack. Yeah, sure. What you're doing is called a witch hunt, doesn't look like your trying to start a discussion... Seems your in it for optics don't accuse me of that.
If I was in it for the optics, this point wouldn't even be brought up. Threads like this attract negative karma for me because it's not a mainstream opinion.
Bro, I want you to look closely. Press your eyes on every letter. You present facts which you pulled out of your ass, I present sources. Address the sources wholistically.
China: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10834-014-9417-0
Afghanistan: https://ivypanda.com/essays/gender-role-in-afghanistan/#:~:t....
Western culture: (also describes the recent societal change) https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Breadwinner_model
Congo: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0192513X2110223...
Ancient greece: https://culturalatlas.sbs.com.au/greek-culture/greek-culture...
India: https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2022/03/02/key-findi...
Mayan culture: https://samnoblemuseum.ou.edu/collections-and-research/ethno....
Inuit: https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Inuit_women
mesoamerica: https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Gender_roles_in_pre-Columbian_Me...
There's a consistent pattern here that illustrates a general norm.