Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

As a long time DDG user, I was looking for a reason to try Kagi out, and this nonsense is finally pushing me over the fence.

Techdirt has been an upstanding place for journalism forever, and getting censored this way is ridiculous.



We have not censored anything -- see my comment here https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36898661 (and others on this thread).


Technically correct. Bing, who powers your search engine, did.


Can you provide some context about Bing censoring Techdirt? These HN comments are the only thing that shows up in a search. The above article says nothing of censorship, other than screenshots of the Bing AI giving "maybe" speculations about it.


I am now looking into Kagi and I love that it seems like they just picked the era where Google wasn't terrible and are emulating the look and feel of that.

The only problem is the pricing model. I don't do overage fees because they make me anxious. I like knowing there is a concrete ceiling on what something will cost me. 300 a month also feels far too low and $10/mo, whether fair or not, feels far too high for a search engine.

This is why I've been working on a behavioural change: stop using search engines and start going right to the websites I know and trust.


At this point, my searches are tending to start at Wikipedia, enough that I might make it my Firefox search default. If it doesn't directly provide enough information for me, it can at least send me in the right direction.


> getting censored this way is ridiculous

This is completely unfounded. Please provide any evidence that this is intentional or related to censorship.


Kagi is an underrated superpower. It just works. I tried Google again recently, and I was astonished how mediocre the results were. If that's the gold standard for no-cost searching, the internet is in serious trouble.


Yeah, Kagi returns better results for me. Is free, but totally worth the one coffee ($5) per month.


Doesn't Kagi just use search APIs to get it results? Why would they be better if they don't build their own index?


Kagi lets me block domains from ever showing up again on my searches ever. That alone is worth 5 bucks a month to me.


Wow, I gotta be honest it might be worth $5/mo to never accidentally get sent to Pinterest ever again


Or fuckin' geeksforgeeks.

I am totally not affiliated with kagi but since I started using it, I haven't gotten pissed at my search engine for sucking ass.

OH! Another feature that actually works on Kagi: Date filtering! Never again will you set that date filter to the last two weeks and receive results that were posted in 2005.



Where have you heard this?

They build their own index: https://help.kagi.com/kagi/why-kagi/kagi-vs-competition.html


They build their own index but don’t let you access it with keyword based queries. Instead the do ‘magic’ and shape the responses from multiple data sources.

I’d love it if instead of ‘magic’ we just had a search engine that let you be the magician with a better query language and ux filters.


They're probably doing something like mapping the embedding of the query to the nearest neighbor in the search given how the front-end of their search infra works


Kagi uses multiple search APIs (including their own) and implements their own ranking and mixing of results. Basically you get the same results with spam removed, with some truly unique results from the in-house engine.


You won't regret it, it's been a lot better than ddg for me.


I've been using Kagi for a little under a year and it is absolutely worth it. DDG gives very inconsistent results and G is just as bad and complete dog shit when the adbloker is off.




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: