On: Moore’s Law is dead – Long live the chiplet

[ordu]

I'd say that the premise of the article is captured in the title perfectly. One needn't to read the article to get it. So, we can strengthen your assertion and to say that "lotta people here are not reading the title." People react to the first part of the title. Seems they are really exasperated by all these repeated deaths of Moore's law.

[brundolf → ordu]

In the title it's a little subtle due to the wordplay and terminology, but yeah, it is present. Definitely a lot of knee-jerking going on

[Eisenstein → ordu]

Does Moore's law require transistors to double on a chip made from a single die?