Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

People are hardly working for Google because they want to.

People are hardly working in slaughter houses and coal mines because they want to.

Feminists I know are selling themselves because they like sex, and controlling their bodies time economy is their choice.

One would think on this forum that it’s a gradient of statistics and not black and white anecdotes would be more obvious.

Exploitation of minors is one thing. Though, I do not see many folks lifting a finger over child political prisoners in rancid cages. So I’m left wondering if exploitation is the real issue or the sex part given cultural norms.



> Feminists I know are selling themselves because they like sex,

Sex work is the only job where you believe the advertising. "I'm selling a little bit of sex because I have such a high sex drive" or "I love sex and I need to fund my way through college" -- they need to say this because most of their punters do not want to buy sex from people who are poor and desperate for money.


[flagged]


How you can connect a handful of (some college educated) women I know putting their body where they want with men they pick as being anything like a billionaires sex cabal drugging and buying kids from poor parents are at all similar is some Machiavellian effort. Bravo.

But since we’re on the subject; maybe put less value into financial trade which is the contemporary value store propping up the exploitation of billionaires.

Perhaps buy fewer gadgets that prop up the economy they grift on from the masses agency.

Perhaps be more for raising taxes to distribute wealth to communities that can use it if you’re that worried.

Above all perhaps avoid centralizing authority over agency in private power. A pattern we keep buying into as a species only to realize it rather makes things worse for the majority.

Put your agency into something that tackles artificial social problems (stock values, disposable widgets sold!, not enough money for M4A or community uplift in poor areas) instead of (sad as it may be) human issues that have existed forever, and there’s precious little we can do about it. Even if billionaire sex cabals vanish, are you going to scour the world seeking out every tribal instance? Or are you simply reaching for acceptable semantics from your perspective?

In other words: walk the walk when it comes to pushing back against immoral behavior as you see it. Semantic battles here over specific instances are self congratulatory and empty if we’ll simply equivocate away structural changes.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: