Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Move Over, AJAX, ARAX Is Here - Asynchronous Ruby and XML (eweek.com)
7 points by nickb on June 6, 2008 | hide | past | favorite | 9 comments


FTA:

"If this is about using Silverlight to host client-side browser scripting in Ruby, it's definitely an appealing notion, but the problem will always be about Silverlight being a Microsoft technology."

I couldn't agree more.


Embrace. Extend. Extinguish.


Who cares who owns it? Microsoft is doing a fine job with the CLR/DLR. The problem isn't Microsoft; it's that thick client is thick client regardless of whether it's .NET, Java, or Flash. Users hate thick client apps.


Users hate thick client apps.

[Citation Needed]

Personally I just want to see a decent bytecode VM defined as a web standard so that I can write in any language that compiles down to it. And it needs to not be locked to any one vendor. Sorry Adobe and Microsoft.


Why not just compile down to Javascript? Research compilers don't compile to assembly; they compile to C.


That's definitely an option. It just feels to me like going around your elbow to get to your knee.


It seems extremely unlikely that Microsoft, Mozilla, Apple, and Opera are going to agree on a cross-browser VM while Javascript, Flash, Silverlight and Java are floating around.

I think we're stuck with Javascript for the next 10 years.


You're probably right. Let's convene again in a decade then?


I prefer to write Ruby than JavaScript, but I do enjoy JavaScript. It's not that big of deal to use both.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: