I wont support VSCode for one reason (downvote to oblivion): it’s “open source” sponsored by a near monopoly corporation, which makes VSCode a marketing tool for Microsoft. This kills the business model of InteliJ which does a lot of work in making great IDEs. Basically, Microsoft is using its wealth to dump a free product on the market and to kill its competitors.
Think about it for a moment: this kind of open source kills genuine businesses due to the monopoly position of the company “sponsoring” it.
> I wont support VSCode for one reason (downvote to oblivion): it’s “open source” sponsored by a near monopoly corporation, which makes VSCode a marketing tool for Microsoft.
You could say the same for every "open source" products backed by a Multi Billion dollars corp, React (Facebook), Go (Google), ... Java (Oracle).
> This kills the business model of InteliJ which does a lot of work in making great IDEs
I don't think so, PHPStorm is still miles aways in front of VSCode for PHP development, and there is no serious Java dev with VSCode either. Jetbrains will be OK.
> Think about it for a moment: this kind of open source kills genuine businesses due to the monopoly position of the company “sponsoring” it.
VSCode became popular because it learned from the philosophy of Textmate and Sublime Text: A good IDE should be first and foremost and excellent text editor. If anything VSCode "killed" Atom, but both belong to the same corporation.
Now yes, Microsoft is getting unpaid developers working on their product. There is certainly a moral angle, but it's not really killing the paid competition.
Not sure why you put "open source" in quotes, because it really is open source. You can freely fork it, modify it, rename it, whatever. I'm not sure what you think Microsoft's angle is for getting people to move away from IntelliJ, but I seriously doubt it's even a consideration. JetBrains makes a ton of money from Microsoft developers (most of our team uses ReSharper and Rider), and I don't think I'd consider VS Code quite in the same league as a dedicated IDE.
I'm curious; do you feel the same way about RedHat? Canonical? Java? What's the criteria for "this company is too big for me to trust their open-source products?"
I’ve put open source between quotes because having a near monopoly company back it makes it feel like a product sold at a dumping price only to increase the company’s brand popularity, so they can cross sell other products. Given Microsoft’s size it can afford “selling” a product for free and open source for as long as it takes to monopolise that niche. I feel the same about google, facebook, and others. I dont feel the same about red hat (pre ibm) or canonical. It’s quite ok to monetise on open source, but not to use it to monopolise yet another niche.
What I want to support is open source projects built by genuinely independent communities or individuals. Also i support high quality paid ides such as those developed by jetbrains. As devs many of us want to be indies, but we dont want to pay for software - a bit of a catch 22.
The issue i have with large companies doing open source is that they use the movement as a marketing tool, and kill indie developers or small companies and truly independent communities, while their core products are still closed source and cross sold thanks to free bait.
Even if Microsoft is hoping to kill competitors, I don’t see how it’s a problem. If people stop using their competitors because VSCode is just as good, then people are using a program that is just as good, for free. That’s a better state of affairs.
Perhaps you’re imagining that at some point Microsoft will stop developing VSCode because it has served its purpose, leaving people with no options. In that situation, people can still use the software for free for a while, until the code rots enough that it won’t run. Possibly by then, volunteers in the open-source community will have started maintaining it. Even if there aren’t enough volunteers to maintain VSCode for free, anyone (such as JetBrains) could start a company that maintains their own fork of VSCode (which they can do because it’s open-source) and charges users to use it. In that case, we are no worse off than before VSCode was introduced; we just had a few years where the popular IDE was temporarily free.
We had that with Google basically killing the RSS reader market, and it looks painfully hard to have it back to anything relevant, so this is a pretty bad scenario.
Now I don’t think VSCode will kill its competitor, it’s not that good IMO.
I don’t know that much about the history of RSS clients, but I’m not sure that Google Reader’s shutdown is comparable to VSCode’s future abandonment in terms of its effects on the market. The crucial difference is that Google Reader was not open source. Maybe if Google Reader had been open source, someone would have kept a fork of it running. I don’t know in what way the RSS reader market was “killed” or why that happened, though, so I can’t say for sure that such a fork would have prevented the market from being killed.
I agree that VSCode is not yet good enough to kill off competitors like JetBrains, so there is little need to worry either way.
I am not worried about microsoft stopping developing it, i am worried about microsoft putting companies out of business using free products, which they then use to cross sell their closed source ides and as a marketing tool. If they are so open source friendly why dont they open source their visual studio, or windows, at least the older eol versions - so we can learn something out of their code, as per open source’s principles?
That’s right. Because they don’t care. They want a marketing product, dumped and aimed at commercial ide developers. VSCode is a free product, with the source code made available and developed by people for free, and for the benefit of microsoft.
I am not worried about microsoft stopping developing it, i am worried about microsoft putting companies out of business using free products, which they then use to cross sell their closed source ides and as a marketing tool.
So would you be opposed to participating in a free forum that is used as a marketing tool by a venture capitalist?
Well I won't downvote you, but your reasoning is a bit poor. There are many open source IDEs out there, VSCode just being just one of the few. So why not boycott all those other editors too?
You also imply that because Microsoft is such a big company it can put more resources than the other editors can, thus having "unfair" advantage over the others? I understand your concern, but as far as I know Microsoft hasn't leveraged VSCode's market share to do anything unreasonable and alas, if they did I'm sure people would just fork the editor without all the BS of Microsoft.
And I'm not against IntelliJ and they make good editors, but I don't want to pay for their products if I any way can. If Microsoft gains goodwill of developers and a lot of users for their product, well good for them! About time they started doing that. I still dislike Windows as much as before, but hey I got now a great editor that is free and I love to use.
It could be maybe a parallel made with Chrome, it was a good browser with tons of money put into it by Google, developers liked it, google got evil but still most people use Chrome instead of Chromium or Firefox.
There's nothing to "support", it's free software that you can use if you want, just like Vim, Atom, and Sublime. Open-source software has supplanted lots of commercial offerings over time. It's standard commoditization.
VSCode isn't endangering any IDEs and has a very long way to go for all that functionality, most of which is provided by the community and not Microsoft. In case you didn't know, Microsoft itself has Visual Studio which has lost its own users to VSCode and Rider alternatives.
Thank you. I appreciate those with the free time to fight the fights they feel are important.
I don't have the luxury to be principled. I just use whatever tools get the job done. Because when Friday afternoon rolls around, I'm going home to be with my kids.
While I agree (and for the same reason think that it was actually a good thing for RSS that Google Reader was killed), it seems that the big companies can never win. If they make a closed source or paid tool the crowd will criticize them, if they make open source it ends up the same.
VSCode is an alternative to Atom, Textmate and Sublime Text.
I’d see Intelij more into the kitchen sink included heavy weight IDE.
I’ll agree with you paying IDE could get more love, but each of these apps have specific strength and weaknesses that make them their own niche. Choosing one or another purely on principals would be weird.
The commoditization of software has been a trend for years. If Intellij wants to charge for a dev environment, they have to offer features that make it worth the cost.
Yeah, well, it's the best IDE I've used for PHP (or any other web development) in a couple of years.
"Think about it for a moment: this kind of open source kills genuine businesses due to the monopoly position of the company “sponsoring” it."
I hate to break it to you, but the only open source projects that last are sponsored by big companies. Most people don't want to work on edge-case bug fixes unless they are paid.
You should be thanking big companies, regardless of Monopoly status, for giving us such great, free, software. Which I might add, took lots of money to create.
kills genuine businesses due to the monopoly position of the company “sponsoring” it.
While I agree with most of your point, since VS Code is open source, can't the commercial IDE makers just borrow the good parts and ideas from VS Code and make their products better?
Sure, it won't mean anything to the sort of people who won't use a paid product for any reason. But it might sway people who are on the fence. Hopefully in the long run that will keep the competitive ecosystem healthy, and not just run all the commercial alternatives out of business.
How this any different than any other open source product has always been? Android killed Windows Mobile - do you have an Android phone? Do you use any software that is “free as in beer” subsidized by other businesses instead of paying for the equivalent software? What about Stack Overflow - it completely killed ExpertsExchange.
Think about it for a moment: this kind of open source kills genuine businesses due to the monopoly position of the company “sponsoring” it.