To distill a good reading list means to have a magnitude bigger ratio of books read to featured than one.
It'd be even funnier if there was a tl;rd bot on HN that'd summarize all good reads in 3 sentences.
I had to cut myself off once I got to a bookshelf of over fifty books I had bought with every intention to read but no time to do so.
Beyond that, there is basically nothing interesting about this post. It’s a list of lists of books that probably covers 99% of the NYT best selling list.
There is nothing novel or interesting to HN readers about this.
The only time linking to twitter is justified IMO is when the linked tweet is truly a primary source of breaking news. If I wanted to read any of the other BS on that site, I would use their app.
And btw it’s not true that you can “technically send anything,” as the HN guidelines  establish. Granted I’m guilty of violating them by calling out this post; I should have just flagged it as trash (which I did) and moved on without commenting.