> You’re using a very narrow definition of ”computer”
Yes, I am, and that’s because I have a mathematical background. I’m quite comfortable in my knowledge that the common-parlance item is actually a ’computer’ as I intend it (narrowly) fused with a communicator that allows it to internetwork with other similarly compound devices.
Yes, I am, and that’s because I have a mathematical background. I’m quite comfortable in my knowledge that the common-parlance item is actually a ’computer’ as I intend it (narrowly) fused with a communicator that allows it to internetwork with other similarly compound devices.