Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

It is completely baseless speculation. It creates an unfounded implication of wrongdoing or subterfuge on the part of Pro Publica without any evidence.

This is a classic FUD tactic.



Absolutely, you could just as easily speculate that Conservative judges are more willing to play fast and loose with facts to fit their purposes.


Either hypothesis is valid given the limited evidence investigated so far. What’s wrong with making a quick observation followed by a hypothesis?


Hypothesis without some evidence are quite literally baseless speculation; if there were evidence, it wouldn't be baseless.


There _was_ preliminary evidence for OP’s hypothesis.


No, there was his judgement of the results as partisan, that is not evidence. Thinking you see bias is not the same thing as finding evidence of bias.


His judgment of the results as partisan wasn’t evidence of anything except perhaps his own bias. That was his hypothesis based on his one observation.

Hypotheses are allowed to be biased as long as they’re tested before becoming anything more.

The evidence (however preliminary) was the fact that nearly all of Pro Publica’s cited rulings were in favor of conservatives.


> The evidence (however preliminary) was the fact that nearly all of Pro Publica’s cited rulings were in favor of conservatives.

I'd still call that opinion, not evidence. A conservative might say those rulings were in favor of reason, not partisan. See, an alternate opinion.


You’re quibbling about words. If we can’t agree that one side favors a particular viewpoint over the other in a given civil case, any further discussion about the presence or absence of political bias in the ruling or selection of the ruling is impossible.


> You’re quibbling about words.

So are you, this whole thread is you quibbling about words.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: