This article has its fair dose of FUD, as NYTimes pertaining to tech usually are. The title sets the tone, and quoting Jalopnik as if they are credible journalism raises some serious eyebrows.
You can typically read the bias in these articles by simply looking at the spin of the first sentence of each paragraph, because it's the pauses between the paragraphs that set the poise and direction of the monologue.
That's pretty observant. I always enjoy the media criticism in HN comments. Folks here are always looking behind the curtain. Yeah, the NY times has always had its own slant (as every source does), which is determined in large part by still having the pick of Ivy League grads who want to pursue journalism (look up the resume of this journalist, for example).
For me, it's the NYT's habit of referencing noise that they helped to create (the "soap opera") as if they were a completely impartial 3rd party; it's like they're blind to their own influence. Reminds me of a Tom Tomorrow cartoon (which I'm too lazy to find).
That more or less nails one major class of attacks. We should try not to feed the trolls (the NYTimes, in this example), so I won't address any points specifically.
There are some common patterns though, and these are worth thinking about because they come straight out of drama and literature. Poise the character as a charismatic, ambitious person. Then start whittling him down. The common themes here are his moments of naivete, the femme fatale, the awful reality of the situation, what others now think of him.
Note that none of these plot elements actually have much (if anything) to do with the economic viability of Tesla, and as such, the title is inappropriate. It does however, make for great rhetoric. Great narratives are rarely, if ever, the bare truth of such specific situations.
Great profile of Elon Musk. The article is about him more than his car company. I would do anything to meet this guy one day.
“He’s one of these just unboundedly ambitious people;
that’s probably the single most important thing about him,
and he’s an eternal optimist, to a fault sometimes,”
It's also inspiring, and scary, to see that he's been broke before the Tesla IPO because he completely believes in the success of the companies he's involved with.
That is unconditional faith in ability.
You can typically read the bias in these articles by simply looking at the spin of the first sentence of each paragraph, because it's the pauses between the paragraphs that set the poise and direction of the monologue.