Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
[dead]
on June 16, 2010 | hide | past | favorite


> As everyone who reads this blog I am sure knows, several months ago, the Gadget blog Gizmodo purchased a then secret unreleased iPhone from someone who claimed to find it in a bar. Gizmodo then wrote a major article about the phone and then gave it back to Apple.

Discussed to death but they committed a crime by purchasing the phone in the first place. They then committed another crime by opening up the iphone and displaying it's contents for all to see. There was amble evidence to open a police investigation. Nobody has been convicted yet.

> But the idea that the FBI gets to ransack your home because you told on some huge corporation who couldn't give a hoot about your security unless they are publicly embarrassed about it is the ultimate example of no good deed going unpunished.

What the guy did was a federal crime. There are laws against what he did. It's the equivalent of breaking into someone's home or a store without causing damage or taking anything. Just the fact you entered without permission means you're committing a crime.


Seconded. He was playing with fire and decided to out the flaw via the media without protecting himself (the source).


I don't know why this guy keeps getting posted to HN - or all the upvotes.

Just about every anti-Apple post, even the ones targeting valid points, has been full of logic flaws/ranting.


A lot of people have apparently come to deeply hate Apple and vote everything against it up.

I'm guessing Steve Jobs ran over quite a lot of puppies last year. That's the only explanation I have for such hatred anyway.


I would assume that it's because Apple has made a lot of people angry for different reasons.

I wouldn't be surprised if there were a few folks here who were frustrated by their iPhone app getting rejected or other such things.


> I wouldn't be surprised if there were a few folks here who were frustrated by their iPhone app getting rejected or other such things.

If they are submitting stories to HN because of that, they need to grow up. Hacker News isn't a place for people to have their little hissy fits. That kind of behavior isn't tolerated here.


But Apple doesn't have a legal right to secrecy. They have to achieve that secrecy through vigilance. If they fail, there is no legal remedy unless it is some form of breach of contract in connection with a non-disclosure.

This is manifestly untrue. The Uniform Trade Secrets Act refutes this entire paragraph. Why are we voting this guy up?


Really. tl;don't read. Not really hn worthy.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: