Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Terrorism, and crime in general is a nuisance that we have to live with. You can have a society with no crime. All you need is a super repressive totalitarian state, total transparency with citizens reporting on each others, state surveillance everywhere. It will work. But first I don't want to live in such a state. And second these totalitarian states slide invariably toward corruption and state crimes.

So we have to live with some level of crime. It doesn't mean we shouldn't be tough on criminals, but we have to accept that it is not possible in a free society to reach zero criminality.

I think the paradox is that people are reasonably relaxed with some level of criminality but are absolutely intolerant to any form of terrorism. And this intolerance is a new phenomenon. Terrorism isn't new. There isn't more terrorism in Europe than 20 or 40 years ago. In fact a few months ago I compiled the number of incidents and victims from a wikipedia page [1]:

https://zbpublic.blob.core.windows.net/public/Deads.png

https://zbpublic.blob.core.windows.net/public/Injured.png

https://zbpublic.blob.core.windows.net/public/Incidents.png

As you can tell, the 70s and 80s were rather more brutal, with far-left, IRA and Palestinian terrorism. And our democracies resisted much better the temptation to introduce more surveillance.

Now why have we become intolerant to terrorism? There are literally tens of thousands of knife attacks every year just in London. Most don't even make it to the local news. Why would this particular incident be treated as a state affair? Terrorism is the buzz of a mosquito. In itself pretty much harmless. But most people will not sleep in a room where they can hear the buzz. I don't have a good explanation. The only thing I can think of is the 24h news cycle where the media will make a big deal of anything that can push the audience up. But that doesn't explain everything. They do the same with plane crashes, but still repeat over and over that though spectacular, plane crashes are extremely rare and flying is extremely safe. Whereas when there is a terrorist attack, the message is "this could happen to YOU!"

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorism_in_Europe



> "... total transparency with citizens reporting on each others, state surveillance everywhere."

Like this? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RIuf1V1FhpY

(Tom Scott's "Oversight" from 2013)


That gave me actual shivers. I can't believe the general populace (especially in the USA and UK) fall for this garbage. The bread and circuses must be really good. Ok maybe just circuses, I think Trump wants to cut SNAP.


I completely agree. You are one of the very few!

I have to ask, what's up with the domain name? Is that some sort of public windows share folder?


It's just the online file storage of Microsoft Azure.


So we have to live with some level of crime. It doesn't mean we shouldn't be tough on criminals, but we have to accept that it is not possible in a free society to reach zero criminality.

As the saying goes, "insecurity is freedom." I've always found it somewhat disturbing that people have welcomed the walled-garden ecosystems popular today, which are essentially the cyber-equivalent.


> ... plane crashes ...

One difference is that airlines advertise in mass media, terrorist organizations don't.


> total transparency

Baxter and Clarke: The Light of Other Days: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Light_of_Other_Days

People should be careful what they wish for.




Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: