For me the lesson here is "use unambigious language"
rather than "{always|never} use an Oxford comma".
The 29-page decision shows that the "Oxford comma" is only part
of the court's interpretation of the law, and shows that
the court examined several paths to reach an interpretation.
For me the lesson here is "use unambigious language" rather than "{always|never} use an Oxford comma".
The 29-page decision shows that the "Oxford comma" is only part of the court's interpretation of the law, and shows that the court examined several paths to reach an interpretation.
http://cases.justia.com/federal/appellate-courts/ca1/16-1901...