As far as quality, if I classify the document wrong today (or fail to classify it), it's not that big of a deal to the system as a whole - but users will be "very" annoyed and have to correct it.
> Are the documents typically very structurally different? Could I probably tell them apart without wearing glasses? Or are they largely the same, but with nuanced differences in the text?
The documents are structurally reasonably different, but not "very" different. If a trained human looks at it, they would be able to tell them apart. There are exceptions, of course. For instance, if the attorney doesn't follow accepted convention, but those are rare.
There's probably a way to determine the document type based on the differing structures (would have to see it to be sure). Alternately, is it not possible for a user to specify what type the document is?
That is exactly right.
As far as quality, if I classify the document wrong today (or fail to classify it), it's not that big of a deal to the system as a whole - but users will be "very" annoyed and have to correct it.
> Are the documents typically very structurally different? Could I probably tell them apart without wearing glasses? Or are they largely the same, but with nuanced differences in the text?
The documents are structurally reasonably different, but not "very" different. If a trained human looks at it, they would be able to tell them apart. There are exceptions, of course. For instance, if the attorney doesn't follow accepted convention, but those are rare.