Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

100-150K here. DO has been very good for us, with some in house auto-scaling, the bill goes as low as $250, uptime has been in the %99.9.

2xLB + frontend servers (from 1 to N) + Postgres (master + multiple read slaves depending on frontned servers) + elasticsearch + redis + image servers.

Only thing that'd probably move us off DO is GCP adding Postgres to their Cloud SQL offering.

But overall, very happy.



Wow, sounds good. Which DB would be cheaper - a managed one or a self-hosted one?

I have been planning to use DO as my personal test-bed (for anything and everything).


Cheaper, definitely self-hosted, but as with everything, you get what you pay for, you'll have to take care of fail-over and backups on your own.

Start with a small instance on DO, enable backups (for a small fee DO will create weekly backups of your instance), as your project grows, tune PgSQL and resize the instance up, add a slave, weekly backups of the instance might not be enough at this point, so also pg_dump the database at a more frequent time interval (1/day), send the backup to 1 or 2 offsite stores (S3/other remote server/etc).

Managed, comes with it's own problems as well, but at least you can blame someone else when it breaks :).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: