Your theory seems to be based on pop-science understanding of concepts like entanglement. A physicist listening to you would just smile and nod their head. There is no need for particles to pass through a single point for entanglement to be a thing. Both the standard model and quantum theory tell us that such an event isn't possible. And as far as I understand, you don't have matter until 10^-12s, well after cosmic inflation.
Quantum entanglement is not a force, does not cause particles to do things, and cannot be used to build a quantum internet. It merely refers to the fact that although quantum states cannot be known till measured, even distantly separated particles will satisfy quantum relations (opposite spin for two particles, etc). They satisfy them in such a way that they either somehow communicated, knew all along, or other possible strange options discussed in multiverse theory. Bell's inequalities prove that they did not know all along.
Dark matter can't be ordinary matter in a second universe because it doesn't interact with itself. It'd have to be dark matter in another universe. Which would be indistinguishable from dark matter in this universe.
Nothing in physics seeks to do anything. The idea that matter would get together and plan to form black holes so that it can transition into some other state is just silly.
You are trying to solve problems that don't exist, with physics that don't exist. Please, read up on:
I've taken the criticism received and edited my comment, but after reading your comment again I think you are being overly critical.
"There is no need for particles to pass through a single point for entanglement to be a thing."
I never said there was, merely proposed it as a possibility.
"Quantum entanglement is not a force, does not cause particles to do things, and cannot be used to build a quantum internet."
Not with classical bits, but theoretically building a quantum internet is possible if we ever figure out how to transmit data via qubits. (as per articles linked)
"Dark matter can't be ordinary matter in a second universe because it doesn't interact with itself."
I don't follow your reasoning here, is there a law that more precisely backs up this statement?
"You are trying to solve problems that don't exist"
On the contrary, I am just using my imagination to attempt to grasp a possible version of grand unified theory, which as far as I know is still something we are trying to work on.
"with physics that don't exist."
How do you know that if you don't know the answer to what dark matter is in the first place? Science isn't just about what we already know, it's about creating falsifiable and testable hypothesis outside the current knowledge-set to expand the currently accepted knowledge set. To criticise hypothesis on content and methodology is valid, but to criticise it simply because it doesn't conform to the current knowledge set is short sighted imho.
> I am just using my imagination to attempt to grasp a possible version of grand unified theory, which as far as I know is still something we are trying to work on.
You're attempting to write a super-duper machine learning giant app without having bothered previously to even learn how to code. Start by learning how to turn on the computer first, and go from there.
It's easy to kick back and dream about grand theories. It's also easy to forget the steep road of learning that would allow you to even approach that realm.
You can transport a qubit via quantum entanglement, yes. That's totally a thing. This might be useful for things like quantum encryption. If that's all you are saying, great. You seemed to be implying that it can replace the current internet and we no longer need fiber optics, wires, or other forms of classical communication.
First, to transport a qubit, you need to send an entangled particle first. This is usually done with fiber optics. You could also send a bunch of particles in traps on a truck, or over the, air, whatever, but you still need to exchange particles for quantum teleportation. Once you've exchanged entangled particles, you can use them to transmit the quantum state of another particle. This might be useful for quantum encryption, but you could just use the originally exchanged particles instead.
Second, you've already stated this, you cannot transmit classical bits. You'd still need all the original Internet infrastructure to transmit classical information. Things like, the British are coming, a funny cat gif, any message really. In fact, entangled states are actually useless without transmitting classical information about the partner particle. Without that, it's impossible to even detect that the particle is part of an entangled pair, much less use the information for anything. The quantum eraser experiment is a great example of this. Without the information about the other entangled particle, all you get is a screen showing that the particle always went through a single slit. Once you know the which way information about each particle, you can separate them out into two interference patterns that cancel out.
Now, there may be something that connects particles quantumly that can be used for communication. Such a thing is not currently part of quantum mechanics and isn't quantum entanglement, such an effect would need some new name.
Regular matter clumps together to form gas clouds, stars, black holes, planets, etc. In general, matter collapses. This happens because particle interactions and collisions generate heat that gets radiated away. Without a mechanism to lose energy, gravitational collapse isn't possible. When we look at galaxies, the stars, gas clouds, etc, tend to fall inward as they lose energy and more matter gets towards the middle than the outside. In spiral galaxies, you see a huge bulge of stars towards the middle. When we look at how fast they rotate, we measure that matter is distributed more or less evenly across the entire plane of the disk. This measurement is really what kicked off our current understanding of dark matter followed by many other discoveries regarding matter distribution.
If dark matter formed stars, planets, gas clouds, etc, like normal matter, it would clump towards the center of galaxies, just like normal matter.
Anyone can theorize whatever they want about the universe, and should not be discourage from doing so. But if your theory makes claims based on current understanding and observations, but the knowledge of that current understanding and observation is incorrect, it seems logical to help that person along. If you want to base your new theories on what is currently understood, it will benefit you greatly to learn as much about current understanding as possible.
Quantum entanglement is not a force, does not cause particles to do things, and cannot be used to build a quantum internet. It merely refers to the fact that although quantum states cannot be known till measured, even distantly separated particles will satisfy quantum relations (opposite spin for two particles, etc). They satisfy them in such a way that they either somehow communicated, knew all along, or other possible strange options discussed in multiverse theory. Bell's inequalities prove that they did not know all along.
Dark matter can't be ordinary matter in a second universe because it doesn't interact with itself. It'd have to be dark matter in another universe. Which would be indistinguishable from dark matter in this universe.
Nothing in physics seeks to do anything. The idea that matter would get together and plan to form black holes so that it can transition into some other state is just silly.
You are trying to solve problems that don't exist, with physics that don't exist. Please, read up on:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pauli_exclusion_principle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chronology_of_the_universe https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bell's_theorem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter