> Why not build a well regulated state that only uses such powers in narrow circumstances?
Because the definition of "well regulated" is highly subjective and any state that's in power would consider its own uses to be with the confines of any circumstance no matter how narrow.
The revolution was good in every way. It was peaceful and the animals got back control of their lives. But even from that, the pigs convinced everyone they needed leaders.
Unfortunately, the pragmatic reality is that no matter how much you try to shape a system of control to be balanced, the people who eventually get into power are the ones that crave it and often don't have much respect for the individual.
Yes, you must continually work to build a more just society. There is no sitting back and enjoying it after you have finished it because it will never be finished.
Because the definition of "well regulated" is highly subjective and any state that's in power would consider its own uses to be with the confines of any circumstance no matter how narrow.
The only way to win is to not play the game.