> Of course if you start to fill a jury with people competent in the area being judged, you run different risks, such as bias within the field. And it's still not clear that it would help with delivering justice.
If you've ever worked at a company with an "problematic" architectural committee you might get a little scared of having them as a jury.
That's because they've been given the position and it's gone to their heads.
If new architecture had to be reviewed by a representative sampling of your workmates, randomly selected for each review, I don't think you'd have such issues.
If you've ever worked at a company with an "problematic" architectural committee you might get a little scared of having them as a jury.