When you follow Reuters method of manipulation you end up with this analogous example: If a stranger said she saw you at McDonald’s eating a cheeseburger; and your neighbor said he also saw you eating a cheeseburger at McDonald’s; well…….
….. as long as the CCTV system at McDonald’s is broken then you can say “evidence fails to show that I ate at McDonald’s”.
Though I am not a trial lawyer, it seems to me that the last sentence would be absolutely correct. But when you have a narrative to support...
….. as long as the CCTV system at McDonald’s is broken then you can say “evidence fails to show that I ate at McDonald’s”.
Though I am not a trial lawyer, it seems to me that the last sentence would be absolutely correct. But when you have a narrative to support...