I listened last year to a great set of lectures about the Philosophy of Science. Too much to go into here, save for the fact that, at the end of the day, it very well may end up that probabilities are all we have to go on for a wide swath of things.
I'm not yet ready to make the leap to total Bayesianism -- those priors can really bite you when you least expect it -- but there is some really good stuff here. Thanks Kaj.
Perhaps we'll see some kind of structured cross between Peirce and Bayes in the next few decades.
I'm not yet ready to make the leap to total Bayesianism -- those priors can really bite you when you least expect it -- but there is some really good stuff here. Thanks Kaj.
Perhaps we'll see some kind of structured cross between Peirce and Bayes in the next few decades.