Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | unwind's comments login

I think the third is scroll lock [1].

That one feels quite legacy to me, every time I active it it's by accident and I don't understand why stuff is behaving weirdly.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scroll_Lock


I love scroll lock still existing on keyboards. Some operating systems still use it to control text scroll for some reason (useful when you don't have `screen` installed maybe?), but I mostly use it for toggles in video games. It shows the toggle state on a physical interface, like one of those fancy programmable macro keyboards, but on commodity hardware!

I believe there are still a number of applications where Scroll Lock is useful, most notably Microsoft Excel.

how so?

With ScrLk off, the arrow keys move the cursor (active cell). With it on, the arrow keys scroll the window contents instead.

(I believe this is actually the original purpose of ScrLk, but most applications these days don’t use it.)


That functionality would actually be useful in all sorts of games, but that's probably a lost cause at this point. We've settled on other paradigms.

Petro (sic) only explodes in specific air-fuel situations

That seems to be true for ammonia as well, at least according to the Wikipedia page's [1] section on Combustion:

Ammonia does not burn readily or sustain combustion, except under narrow fuel-to-air mixtures of 15–28% ammonia by volume in air.

That doesn't sound too horrible, it feels like gasoline/petrol is easier to combust (although I know it's the fumes that are actually flammable).

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ammonia#Combustion


Maybe I wasn't clear. Ammonia is burning is not the worry. Ammonia in small quantities will kill you directly. no fire needed, it will kill you.

To be clear, "small quantities" are in units of parts per million. 5ppm (0.0005%) and the room smells of ammonia, 25ppm means you should be wearing a respirator, 500 ppm (0.05%) can be lethal.

Warning that 15% air-ammonia mixtures can burn is like warning that 100 kg of TNT could give you a concussion if it fell on your head. It's just not the concern at all.


This risk factor sounds less like a normal chemical substance and more on the level of uranium

It’s comparable to carbon monoxide, except you can’t smell that one.

Awesome in some kind of retro way, since this a thing that C "never" has had in my experience, it being older (by far) than the web and the idea that new programming languages need to be promoted/anchored to a web site.

I couldn't see which person(s) and/or organizations are behind the site though, I feel that should be made easier to find if it's on there at all, else added.

Thanks!


This quote:

The 153rd episode is scheduled for April 14 and many believe that it will be the end of the show in its current form (more on this later).

Measurably increased my stress level ... :(


The article is from the past, all three series are available on DVD.

The last episode is great on an almost Pixar level - there’s three separate stories happening and kids will only really pick up on one and a half.


I've noticed nearly every Bluey episode has parallel stories. I think this is part of what makes it so entertaining for adults- kids are excited by the obvious message, while parents who need more to keep them stimulated enjoy watching the threads interweave. The writing is simply the best.

Ah, thanks, then it's not worse than before. :)

And yes, the wedding episode is epic although we pretty much love all of it.


There's a movie in the works, but we'll see how that turns out.

https://blueypedia.fandom.com/wiki/Bluey:_The_Movie


There is a movie planned. And LEGO sets.

Meta: strange typo in title, "Shepard" should be "Shepherd".

Perhaps the shepherd's name is Shepard. :-)

As I cannot change the title anymore I think that’s my best option now :-)

The two spellings are the same. First sentence from the Wikipedia entry [1]:

In computing, a file system or filesystem (often abbreviated to FS or fs) governs file organization and access.

[1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_system


I tried to figure out if the translation is correct (the concept of a "studio apartment" in English is not easy to express in Swedish, and "ateljé" is certainly not it).

I even found this [1] comment on Reddit, detailing the exact same concern. Perhaps worth looking into?

[1]: https://www.reddit.com/r/Svenska/comments/1j4teje/comment/mg...


I'm guessing it is pretty easy to express in Swedish once you learn how to speak about housing, though.

Don't know Swedish, but I'm fully lower-to-mid intermediate with Norwegian (I hit limits, but my workplace is Norwegian). Swedish and Norwegian are really similar. In Norwegian, they don't talk about bedrooms as much as total major rooms. So a studio apartment, the sort that contains a private bath and kitchen area, is a one-room apartment. A one bedroom is a two-room apartment.

And it looks like Swedish (unsurprisingly) is similar: https://www.reddit.com/r/Svenska/comments/16aigvx/question_o...


A studio apartment in Swedish is "en etta", literally meaning a "one room". An apartment with one bedroom would then be "en tvåa", two bedrooms "en trea".

True, it's actually quite simple. :)

The main point stands though, that this is not about art studios but just small apartments, and the automatic translation messes that up.


It's not a studio apartment though. The book takes place in some kind of arts center:

"And at exactly the same instant Signor Jacobelli was bursting without warning or ceremony into a studio on the second floor where a model posed."


Thanks!

I had a look at the code and it looked distinctly like C++, but it turns out there is a C version [1] too. Haven't looked into it further.

[1]: https://github.com/syoyo/tinyobjloader-c


The caption says:

European Model Shown. U.S. model only available with clear windscreen.

Is that the piece of orange plastic in front of the handlebar base, that they are calling a "windscreen"?


Yes. And it works (well enough) because at speed the chunk of air it forces up mixes with the air above the bike (that the rider would otherwise hit with their face) and disturbs it so the rider experiences something more a akin to riding in a pickup bed than to sticking their head out a sunroof.

Thanks, this was the sentence that was missing from the article and made me confused knowing that humans are basically made of carbon, but glass is not.


The article should have said “a glass”, not “glass”. The former is a term from physics that is different from the lay-mans’s “glass”. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass_transition:

“The glass–liquid transition, or glass transition, is the gradual and reversible transition in amorphous materials (or in amorphous regions within semicrystalline materials) from a hard and relatively brittle "glassy" state into a viscous or rubbery state as the temperature is increased. An amorphous solid that exhibits a glass transition is called a glass.”

The Nature article is clearer. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-025-88894-5: “Glass forms when a liquid is fast cooled preventing crystallization, across a reversible process known as the glass transition.

[…]

Here we demonstrate that material with glassy appearance found within the skull of a seemingly male human body entombed within the hot pyroclastic flow deposits of the 79 CE Vesuvius eruption formed by a unique process of vitrification of his brain at very high temperature”

The layman’s term includes such things as safety glass, which may have polymer layers.

So, confusingly, not all glass is “a glass”, and not all glasses are glass.


However, I've not been able to find much on carbon-oxgen based glass. It's possible to make glass out of CO2 gas, under high pressure. However, at standard pressure, the glass boils off into CO2.

There are definitely some unconnected dots in the story. I have a sense that what is needed is to reproduce this allegedly vitrefied organic material in the lab.

Could this actually be more like a plastic? Some thermoplastics share characteristics with the category of glass, like having amorphous structure and a gradual softening resembling glass transition temperature. Conversely, we could say that glass, such as a common silica glass, is a kind of thermoplastic.

In:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermoplastic

we have language like "[a]bove its glass transition temperature and below its melting point, the physical properties of a thermoplastic change drastically without an associated phase change."

Also:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass#Polymers

"Many polymer thermoplastics familiar to everyday use are glasses."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Glass#Non-silicate_glasses

"Besides common silica-based glasses many other inorganic and organic materials may also form glasses, including [...] nitrates, carbonates, plastics, acrylic, and many other substances."


> humans are basically made of carbon, but glass is not

A glass is something that underwent a glass transition (that looks like a liquid at the atomic scale but behaves like a solid microscopically, resulting from cooling a liquid too fast to let it crystallise). It can be made of a huge diversity of things: pure elements (like carbon or sulphur), some metallic alloys, oxides, sulphides, fluorides, polymers, etc.


But the article says "glass", not "a glass".


Using “glass” as a strict equivalent for “silicate glass” is incorrect. Metallic glass is glass. Not the glass you are used to, but still glass.

I'm not convinced that that is common usage. Maybe in technical circles.

Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: