Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | turtlepower's commentslogin

Correct.


In this case I'd like to be able to revert the merge.


The terrible kerning makes this font barely readable.


What? It has great keming!


Very dean and modem.


Flatter than flat.


Not sure if Serif or Sans, though...


it is sans, obviously. a font without serifs (and this one has definetly no serifs) can not be serif.


I would've gone with "monospace", but I guess I can't argue with your approach...


They had me at -Og.


The -fsanitize=address and -fsanitize=thread sound like a very useful feature too, a nice complement to valgrind and -fmudflap.


They could do what modern computers do and apply error correction codes. I mean if we're already teleporting knowledge into the past we might as well go all the way.


And yet 99% of bitcoins in circulation have traces of cocaine on them.


On MIT campus you can tell which building you're in by your IP...


Yeah /8 what a waste.

Many organizations were asked to return /8 in exchange to /16, but snobs at MIT refused.


Why should MIT have to pay for someone else's historical mistakes? The IP addresses are just as valuable as any other part of MIT's endowment, and universities don't typically give their assets away for no reason. (If someone wants MIT to change to a /16, I'm sure there's some sum of money that could convince them.)

Ultimately, even if everyone gave their IPv4 addresses back, there would still be a tiny supply of addresses that can't scale. So we need IPv6 regardless of who is greedy about their IPv4 space.


You also need to manage false positives almost perfectly, as you're going to try to ruin someone's professional credibility.


It's pronounced "shah three."


Because that is the chemical formula for ketchup.


I laughed out loud when I read your comment. Very good!


There are several slight distinctions to be made there. A keynote/powerpoint presentation is typically displayed as though on a piece of paper (A4, say), and thus of course type should be rendered proportionate to the virtual piece of paper, no matter the display. The post is referring mostly to HTML sizes.

The second distinction is that a projector or video monitor should duplicate the master screen, and indeed for a projector you have no idea how big the final screen is, and can change its size by moving the projector around. Video projections, similar to paper, are a proportionate medium.

Not making these distinctions is definitely an oversight of the linked article. His major point is well illustrated in his example picture, where "5 inches" has been displayed with varying degrees of accuracy, but it's clear all the monitors are trying to display something _close_ to 5 inches. Not getting it exact (±½ pixel) is a failure.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: