Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | the_real_cher's comments login

It fills me with joy to see that the tech industry isn't vanishing as quick as the company makes it out to be.

they're actually just covering for a funding problem.


It's not really bad thought.

It's clear, it's intuitive, it's easy to understand on first glance, it's a single purpose function, it's easy to step through.

you don't have anything to defend here.


Amen!

I think the more experienced you get in coding the more you appreciate straight forward code you can immediately look at and understand.


Does India have less rigorous people in charge?


India's civil institutions have more growing to do, certainly.


The H1B system is so rife with corruption at every level and needs to be stopped.


Now that the weather is nice I got a helinox chair and a small goal zero yeti and with my a wifi hotspot I can go work in the park outdoors or on a patio all day.

It's heavenly.

I also love my bluetooth headphones with Noise Cancellation. I can be in my own world at the gym, at work, at the coffeeshop.


If you took every penny from all the billionaires in the USA it would fund the US government for 8 months.

The threat is the Government.


the real treat is the wide and growing inequality, coming from individuals or goverments (made of individuals too) is the same.


> If you took every penny from all the billionaires in the USA it would fund the US government for 8 months

That's actually horrifying to me in the completely opposite way that it is to you.

That just a handful of people (<1000) can use individually at will more than half of resources that elected representatives of 300mln people administer in a year.


And Supreme Court Justices would need to pay for their own holidays.


> If you took every penny from all the billionaires in the USA it would fund the US government for 8 months.

How is this relevant? The article was about funding journalism, not funding the government.


This is merely an attempt to show just how lopsided the wealth distribution is. Imagine being able to afford to run the US government for any meaningful length of time with your personal wealth. I'm lucky I can run my modest household. Multi-billionaires are like black holes. They are capable of distorting the very fabric of society. Democracy has no meaning under these circumstances. We have a much more severe problem here than funding journalism.


> This is merely an attempt to show just how lopsided the wealth distribution is.

I'm confused about what "This" refers to and why you're replying to me, as opposed to the OP.

> We have a much more severe problem here than funding journalism.

I agree. Nonetheless, the submitted article is about funding journalism, so the OP's comment appears to be a non sequitur.


Or correctly invested, fuel the real good economy for 80years


You should share the secret of how to “correctly invest”, because the point of the parent comment was that it’s not about the capital



The global market has changed a lot since 1930s.

In the 30s, customers can't place orders on the order side of the ocean and have it the same week.


yes, and some changes are not for the best. But for the real big global market of resources, oil, gas, steel, energy, high-tech.. some ideas are still valid imho, of course to be adapted. And i notice that the lifes of 99.99% of us people has not even a fraction of the freedom of capitals and goods, and this is another side of the problem.


Looking at inflation-adjusted dollars or even fraction-of-GDP, Biden has spent more on stimulus and new investment programs than the entirety of the New Deal. So what gives? Maybe it’s not a capital problem.


Even better you can let the AI write tests.


An interesting thing I'm seeing happening in primary care is that doctors are being replaced by doctor adjacent professions like Nurse Practitioner, Physician Assistant, etc.

A doctor spends a decade working 60 to 80 hour weeks studying medicine whereas an NP is a Master degree, I think which can be obtained online.

There doesn't appear to be clear results yet in studies on the outcomes of NP's vs MD's (see reference).

Another argument is that maybe all that medical school training is overkill in Primary Care and this is perfect setting for NP's or PA's. And also maybe most doctors are not ambitious and forget most of the training they're not using on a daily basis anyway.

I think it would be pretty funny if after more studies NP's showed no different outcomes than MD's.

Interesting write up on NP outcomes.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18766097/


I can't believe that in a state with 40 million people, there was only 4700 hundred private sector jobs created?

Is this serious?

I'm no democrat but this article seems off.

This data says California created 17 million new jobs.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/job-growth-...

Wheres the disconnect?


The number "created" in TFA is just the delta in employed over the time period, with every person no longer employed in-state (for any reason) counting against the people newly employed in CA. Click the link in the article to see the graph of CA jobs, there's seasonal fluctuations but overall it looks flat over the last two years.


17.9 million in your link is "Total Jobs (Feb 2023)".


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: