Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | small_model's commentslogin

When I want to buy something I search for it or ask AI for recommendations etc. Why not have a toggle, this is a search for product so shower me with ads related. Not all the time when I am just causally browsing.

With the films budget they could have sourced a small nuclear bomb the size of the original Trinity test and detonated it just for the movie. Just make sure the camera is rolling as it's a one take shot.

It’s pretty morbid but I think I would go watch if there ever was a public nuclear above surface test again. I hope it will never happen.

This is something that happened[0]. Not sure about that site, but a search returned a bunch of similar sites with no domains I was familiar.

[0] https://www.storyhunt.io/en/articles/the-atomic-parties


I don't think I've ever read a story that encapsulates the vibe of Fallout more than this one. Thanks for sharing!

I would too, and I think it should happen.

I’m in Australia, so it’s only a (relatively) short drive to Woomera.

We should make sure our (the West’s) nuclear deterrent still actually works, and put the fear of God back in to everyone.

And also demonstrate how relatively benign the fallout from a thermonuclear weapon is, ie. relatively little radioactive material is generated from modern nuke.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_nuclear_tests_at_Maral...


Never had the need to do playwright automation for tmux, so not sure why I would use this above tmux which works well.

with rmux you can finally do acceptance/integration tests on your terminal user interfaces. tmux is made for humans, rmux is made for both humans and machines

Why C#? would be good if you added explanation of the reason.

I'm not very familiar with k3 and how it's ffi story looks like but it sounds like ksharp has a dedicated C# and .net ecosystem angle:

https://github.com/ERufian/ksharp#foreign-function-interface...


My own initial reaction is... why not? :) Especially if the author knows C# already.

SpaceX have presented on this and it's fairly straightforward and they already do it with starlink satellites, just at a larger scale. Sound like you are the uniformed one (or an EDS victim)


Starlink satellites don't generate the sort of heat a datacenter full of GPUs does. The ISS has enormous radiators, and it's only in space because it's a space station. Putting datacenters there is just goofy given the amount of available space on the ground.


All of that has been repeatedly addressed in anything that discusses it, if you care to try to understand. It has ~nothing to do with available space, the US grid can’t handle the current rate of expansion. It’s bad enough that apparently Span, the smart electrical panel company, is pitching a box full of Blackwells that’ll sit outside new construction homes and use all the headroom on residential 200A circuits. Space is starting to look reasonable.

Related, US readers should call their reps and ask them to support a successor to EPRA, the Energy Permitting Reform Act, the vast majority of the generation that’s waiting for approval is from clean energy sources. It nearly got over the line before the last Congress ended, and it’s one of the most impactful things we can do to combat climate change, combined with electrifying various carbon intensive activities.


> the US grid can’t handle the current rate of expansion

This is a self defeating argument. Neither can space!

Any scenario in which you can get data centers and power into orbit is easier on land.


Not quite, I'm rooting for the solar/battery microgrids down here, one of the startups I've invested in is working on those, but you don't really even need batteries for panels in a dawn-dusk sun synchronous orbit, which is a pretty huge advantage. Also, there aren't weeks where you have 1/4 the output because it's just cloudy all week, and your output isn't crushed during winter.

And the hardest part of my home solar install, by far, was the counterparties (inspectors, power company, and subcontractors). My understanding is that it's much worse when you're trying to get a grid scale install online, the interconnection queue is currently years long. This avoids most counterparties except the ones they're already routinely dealing with.


Why are you comparing the output of a datacenter to the output of a single sat?

How much power do starlink sats draw and how does it compare to say 8x H200s?


> This gives us access to more than 300 megawatts of new capacity (over 220,000 NVIDIA GPUs) within the month.

27,500 satellites need launching - fast! - just for Claude to meet a demand spike?


There are over 10k starlink sats in orbit already. They’re obtaining approval for another ~30k.

So clearly not a problem for them.


I've heard this before and these are not comparable at all. Starlink is missing a few digits in it's power usage and heat dissipation needs compared to a datacenter.


Why did we start saying EDS this week, just in time for the IPO?


EDS? Like still believing Elon's claims are truthful?


Is volume or revenue/profit/margin etc? Quite important to know this.


"We wont take contributions from non hand written assembly code, these C 'high level' language patches are not allowed. Zig is a great project and language but it will die on this hill.


You paint them wrongly as elitists.

It's a critique of low effort PRs compared to the high effort review they require.


So annoying, I got stuff to do!


Do they produce reports on why they are down regularly? Quite annoying


Impressive mission but I feel it's not capturing the public attention because it's actually a step back from the mission 50 years ago when they actually landed men on the moon with tech that was orders or magnitude simpler and less powerful.


I've noticed there's a pretty big difference between the people who remember how routine shuttle flights became and the younger crowd at work. I do think Artimis is cool, but I will admit to being a bit jaded about it as a GenX who watched Challenger live in 2nd grade. The GenZ at work seem genuinely delighted. And that's pretty cool.


I think it you ask the average person they're more surprised that people haven't been going to the moon for the past 50 years. In people's minds it's a solved problem and it's been boring for decades now. If supersonic air travel came back it would only interest people because of reduced journey times. But this doesn't even have anything that directly benefits people so they don't care.


A diverse and inclusive crew, a publically-funded mission, an emphasis on science and discovery, and government investment in a long-term strategy, not a quick politcal win.

This current administration has made sure these things never happen again, Artemis is very much the swan song of an America that has died. I am not interested in watching our corpse twitch and calling it life.


> an emphasis on science and discovery

Sorry, what science and discovery is that bringing?

I mean it's technically really cool, but I fail to see the science and discovery there.


Why don’t you look it up instead of guessing? I mean even on the surface level, for me, exploring space is the most “science and discovery” thing you can do!


Curiosity, Perseverance, Rosetta. Those are science and discovery.

Sending people in space? Mostly cool engineering.


From NASA

>> Under Artemis, NASA will send astronauts on increasingly difficult missions to explore more of the Moon for *scientific discovery*, economic benefits, and to build on our foundation for the first crewed missions to Mars.

Yeah fuck me for thinking this was about that that.


Do you think they would say "with the same budget we can obviously make better science with unmanned missions, but people find the manned ones cooler"?


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: