Cmd+Shift+V - Stacked clipboard, you can start typing to search or hit a number to choose what to paste (keeps everything you've copied/cut inside jetbrains for a while)
Cmd+Shift+E - Recent locations, you can start typing to search - shows little buffers of where you've been recently
Cmd+Shift+A - Action tab of the command palette - fuzzy search for any command (really the only shortcut you need, other than maybe Shift+Shift for main command palette shortcut)
--- Through the Action bar...
Local History / Local History of Selection - you can start typing to search quite far back the history of all changes of the current file or selection - you can also right click a folder or the project and do the same. Much finer grained than git.
The general concept of being able to search for something and edit directly in the buffer of the search results.
Hero! I had not done my homework/have not been aware, but these all look fantastic! The stacked clipboard is something I periodically mentally complain about (Why is clipboard on every OS/tool I've used single item?)
I will add one that are possibly more well-known:
- ctrl + shift + F: Find text in any file
- ctrl + N: Find types (structs, classes etc)
- ctrl + shift + N: Find any file by name or path
Windows has had a pretty usable stacking clipboard for a while! You just have to activate it. Since you can pin thing into it it’s also quite useful as a rough and ready way to type special characters you use frequently.
Mathematica is the earliest thing I am aware of with this feature where it was Alt+. to expand selection in their notebook interface starting in the early 90s. But the thing I miss most that I still can't shake the muscle memory of after almost a decade of not using much Mathematica, is that single/double/triple/n-click scaled this way as well. So double-click selected a whole word (as in all editors), triple-click selected all the comma-separated multiple args of a function, 4-click for f(a,r,g,s), and so on.
I work on AST based revision control. I have a stack of ideas on how to achieve the same Ctrl+W effect with commits/diffs/cherry-picks. All still in flux. If you have some thoughts to share, please do.
I use it constantly in helix too. The vscode one is meh. I think I saw a discussion in github once about switching to tree-sitter, which would improve AST-related actions. I don't think it went anywhere though.
I love AST aware editing. I think it's one reason it's always been so nice to edit lisps. Stuff that is complicated to describe in javascript (and doesn't have LSP support) p much requires a whole AST parser, but in lisp it's just a simple list operation. When I go back typescript after a weekend of clojure, I reeaally miss slurp! and other paredit commands
I tried it, but it just was too clumsy. Sometimes refactoring/editing needs to go through phases where the AST is invalid, and MPS makes that just too clumsy.
To me, it feels like Zed and VsCode perform most operations in a general way on the text; they don't seem to (in Python and Rust at least) have an understanding of the code structure in the way JB does. (And based on some digging on Ki the way it does as well?) So, I would bet they are using that text-based model, which would be hit/miss here.
I had this issue too, so I remapped Ctrl-W/Shift-Ctrl-W to Ctrl-\/Shift-Ctrl-\ .
(Also git operations became two-key sequences, starting with Ctrl-G and that damn Ctrl-K stopped being the shortcut for commit.)
To keep on-top of tabs in Firefox, I use 'Auto Tab Discard' [1] to discard tabs after a certain amount of inactivity. Then when I need to clean up my list of tabs, I click on any discarded tabs I want to keep, and then use my extension 'Close Discarded Tabs' [2] to clear the rest.
> 7/18/24 10:20PT - Hello everyone - We have widespread reports of BSODs on windows hosts, occurring on multiple sensor versions. Investigating cause. TA will be published shortly. Pinned thread.
This was particularly interesting (from the reddit thread posted above):
> A colleague is dealing with a particularly nasty case. The server storing the BitLocker recovery keys (for thousands of users) is itself BitLocker protected and running CrowdStrike (he says mandates state that all servers must have "encryption at rest").
> His team believes that the recovery key for that server is stored somewhere else, and they may be able to get it back up and running, but they can't access any of the documentation to do so, because everything is down.
> but they can't access any of the documentation to do so, because everything is down.
One of my biggest frustrations with learning networking was not being able to access the internet. Nowadays you probably have a phone with a browser, but back in the day if you were sitting in a data room and you'd configured stuff wrong, you had a problem.
Isn’t that what office safes are for? I don’t know the location, but all the old guard at my company knew that room xyz at Company Office A held a safe with printed out recovery keys and the root account credentials. No idea where the key to the safe is or if it’s a keypad lock instead. Almost had to use it one time.
I'm guessing someone somewhere said that "it must be stored in hard copy in a safe" and the answer was in the range of "we don't have a safe, we'll be fine".
Or worse, if it's like where I worked in the past, they're still in the buying process for a safe (started 13 months ago) and the analysts are building up a general plan for the management of the safe combination.
They still have to start the discussions with the union to see how they'll adapt the salary for the people that will have to remember the code for the safe and who's gonna be legally responsible for anything that happens to the safe.
Last follow-up meeting summary is "everything's going well but we'll have to modify the schedule and postpone the delivery date of a few months, let's say 6 to be safe"
Not just financial / process barriers. I worked for a company in the early 90's that needed a large secure safe to store classified documents and removable hard drives. A significant part of the delay in getting it was figuring out how to get it into the upstairs office where it would be located. The solution involved removing a window and hiring a crane.
When we later moved to new offices, somebody found a solution that involved a 'stair-walking' device that could supposedly get the safe down to the ground floor. This of course jammed when it was halfway down the stairs. Hilarity ensued.
Didn't bookmark it or anything and going back to the original reddit thread I now see that there are close to 9,000 comments, so unfortunately the answer is no...
Absolutely correct. Unfortunately, there is no other solution to this issue. If the laptops were powered down overnight, there might be a stroke of luck. However, this will be one of the most challenging recoveries in IT history, making it a highly unpleasant experience.
Yeah in context we have about 1000 remote workers down. We have to call them and talk through each machine because we can't fix them remotely because they are stuck boot looping. A large proportion of these users are non-technical.
MS Windows Recovery screen (or the OS installer disk) might ask you for the recovery key only, but you can unlock the drive manually with the password as well! I had to do that a week ago after a disk clone gone wrong, so in case someone steps on the same issue (this here is tested with Win 10, but it should be just the same for W11 and Server):
1. Boot the affected machine from the Windows installer disk
2. Use "Repair options"
3. Click through to the option to spawn a shell
4. It will now ask you for unlocking the disk with a recovery key. SKIP THAT.
5. In the shell, type: "manage-bde -unlock C: -Password", enter the password
6. The drive is unlocked, now go and execute whatever recovery you have to do.
> Can you even get the secret from the TPM in recovery mode?
Given that you can (relatively trivially) sniff the TPM communication to obtain the key [1], yes it should be possible. Can't verify it though as I've long ago switched to Mac for my primary driver and the old cheesegrater Mac I use as a gaming rig doesn't have a hardware TPM chip.
yea I don't need an attack on a weak system, I mean the authorized legal normal way of unlocking BL from Windows when you have the right credentials. Windows might not be able to unlock BitLocker with just your password.
I don't know how common it is to disable TPM-stored keys in companies, but on personal licenses, you need group policy to even allow that.
Although this is moot if Windows recovery mode is accepted as the right system by the TPM. But aren't permissions/privileges a bit neutered in that mode?
Most people installed CrowdStrike because an audit said they needed it. I find it exceedingly unlikely that the same audit did not say they have to enable Bitlocker and backup its keys.
I can confirm this. EDR checkbox for CrowdStrike, BitLocker enabled for local disk encryption checkbox. BitLocker backups to Entra because we know reality happens, no checkbox for that.
I know it does for personal accounts once linked to your machine. Years ago, I used the enterprise version and it didn’t, probably because it was “assumed” that it should be done with group policies, but that was in 2017.
Yes you should be able to pull it from your domain controllers. Unless they're also down, which they're likely to be seeing as Tier 0 assets are most likely to have crowdstrike on them. So you're now in a catch 22.
Rolling back an Active Directory server is a spectacularly bad idea. Better make doubly sure it's not connected to any network before you even attempt to do so.
In theory. I've seen it not happen twice. (The worst part is that you can hit the Bitlocker recovery somewhat randomly because of an irrelevant piece of hardware failing, and now you have to rebuild the OS because the recovery key is MIA.)
It includes PDFs of some relevant support pages that someone printed with their browser 5 hours ago. That's probably the right thing to do in such a situation to get this kind of info publicly available ASAP, but still, oof. Looks like lots of people in the Reddit thread had trouble accessing the support info behind the login screen.
If you train a bigger model on more text, we have a lot of confidence that the next-word prediction task will improve. So algorithmic progress is not necessary, it's a very nice bonus, but we can sort of get more powerful models for free, because we can just get a bigger computer, which we can say with some confidence we're going to get, and just train a bigger model for longer, and we are very confident we are going to get a better result.
How are people using these local code models? I would much prefer using these in-context in an editor, but most of them seem to be deployed just in an instruction context. There's a lot of value to not having to context switch, or have a conversation.
I see the GitHub copilot extensions gets a new release one every few days, so is it just that the way they're integrated is more complicated so not worth the effort?
You can use Continue as a drop-in replacement for Copilot Chat with Code Llama. We've released a short tutorial here: https://continue.dev/docs/walkthroughs/codellama. It should save you a lot of time context-switching; you can just highlight code and ask questions or make edits, all with keyboard shortcuts
This works well for me except the 15B+ don't run fast enough on a 4090 - hopefully exllama supports non-llama models, or maybe it'll support CodeLLaMa already I'm not sure.
http://cursor.sh integrates GPT-4 into vscode in a sensible way. Just swapping this in place of GPT-4 would likely work perfectly. Has anyone cloned the OpenAI HTTP API yet?
I was tasked with a massive project over the last month and I'm not sure I could have done it as fast as I have without Cursor. Also check out the Warp terminal replacement. Together it's a winning combo!
Is there some trick to doing validation of request data using this process? That's a valuable part of using something like tRPC, JSON Schema + type generation, zod, etc.
I’m not happy with the design decision in that codebase to try to “simplify” Typescript types before compiling, and probably won’t continue that implementation, but we have a few internal code generators that consume TS types and output test data builders and model clases we use in production.
I want to open source some of those bits but haven’t found the time.
Deepkit looks really cool, but it’s so complex on the inside and leverages a forked/patched Typescript and requires full typecheck before emit.
What happens if the Deepkit guy retires? What if I want to run my code without waiting for 11 minutes of typechecking? What if there’s a bug somewhere in there?
There’s way too much risk for me to consider Deepkit for production.
Don't forget Right-To-Left languages, that also affects how UI elements are arranged (position within the page) and rendered (input widgets like sliders get reversed).
I think the currently blessed CSS solution is to only use {inline,block}-{start,end} https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/CSS_logical... in place of {left,right,top,bottom} which then automagically supports even vertical scripts like Traditional Mongolian, but most people probably don't think that far ahead when just starting out.
I know Traditional Mongolian comes up regularly in i18n contexts, but I've never taken the time to see if it's something an app should support, based on how actively it is used. It seems like it's too minor, mostly due to the fact that nobody could be bothered to support it in electronic formats.
Vertical Japanese is very common in the print magazines I read, and is RTL amongst the rest of the Japanese text which is LTR. I just don't see it much online because of the trouble of setting it.
If I ever have too much spare time I must try to support vertical Mongolian in my app.
Interested in the ergonomics of this, it's more similar to GitHub Copilot Chat in VS Code, than regular Copilot. There's no autocomplete like in regular Copilot, so for new code I may end up using Copilot, and for refactoring I may end up using this.
