The gopher one it's broken upon using a URL with no selector: gopher://sdf.org for instance. it defaults to a 0 one so it doesn't show up right, you need to state gopher://sdf.org/1/ by hand. Otherwise, it works great.
On the man plugin, for the users with mandoc/mdoc, I found a bug, '-T html' should be '-Thtml' without spaces. Then works fine.
Because I considered it a good starting point as I can place a redirect notice there if we move to another place, without worrying we will lose the DNS again. If you want to help, feel free to do so :-)
This cost me $17.32 for two years—so this time next year, even if there's not $11 or whatever available, there'll be a whole other year to come up with it.
NearlyFreeSpeech.NET (which this isn't using right now; it's just on a free static host) allows anyone to deposit funds into an account for sites hosted there, not just the person behind the site, which means it can in theory stay up indefinitely, even if the person in charge is incapacitated and/or stops putting their own money into it (so long as they don't actively take an interest against its continued operation).
What prevents you from doing some tests? We have seen Dillo running in a lot of old and not very common machines (Atari), so you may have some work already done.
Stupid (and unthankful) question perhaps, but have you considered working on https://ladybird.dev instead? Kling and the small team seem to be making great progress.
AFAIK, Ladybird goal is to build an independent web browser from scratch that can render the "modern" web.
Dillo original goal[1] is to provide access to the web to places with very bad internet speed or latency as well as old or resource constrained computers.
I don't think we will ever implement JS support, as that would increase a lot the minimum requirements to run Dillo and make the attack surface on the browser much bigger.
Rather than joining Ladybird, it would be great to see a merge of Netsurf and Dillo as a very lightweight alternative to Blink/Webkit/Gecko/Goanna-based browsers.
If you like Carbonyl, but want something simpler, you may also find my TUI browser Chawan[0] interesting. It supports CSS and JS (kind of...), but unlike Carbonyl, it has its own browser engine written from scratch. It also bears similarities to Dillo, in that it's easy to add custom protocols.
If you combine performance & stability of Dillo with better HTML5 support of Netsurf, you could get a great lightweight alternative to mainstream browsers.
Often by using Dillo's minimal CSS web sites get far less broken than with Netsurf.
With Dillo I'd just had as a 'new' feature, audio and video links opened with xdg-open (or
any other plumber) and better Unicode support, which might be reduced due to
FLTK, but FLTK itself calls XFT, so I doudt it, as I happened to perfectly open Motif
based stuff compiled against XFT with the full coverage of the Unifont font set.
In some ways it would miss the main use of dillo, but at the same time if you were going to embed a browser like that surely dillo is a great option precisely because of how light it is.
[1]: https://dillo-browser.github.io/user_help.html#cookies