Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | regular_person's commentslogin

"My landlord hasn't lowered rent, but to incentivize us to stay he replaced our washing machine and upgraded some stuff around the property."

So what he should have been doing anyway. Amazing.


Was the washing machine broken before the replacement?


Yes.


You're assuming this technology actually works, when in practice it engages in more racial profiling than the also-racist human police force.


Just because we're currently well paid doesn't mean we wouldn't benefit from a union


Maybe in the countries where unions are unregulated. Not in my country, where union would get me way lower pay, longer weeks, inability for various work hours adjustments that I normally do, etc. IT sector is very fortunate to not be regulated.


I found it very slick and cool-looking but not really conducive to absorbing information.


This is a great point. It's not (necessarily) that Americans are just inherently money-hungry; we just have to be because we live in a system that is really callous and unmerciful compared to other places in the world.


There are plenty of people in America who continue to chase money long after their safe retirement is assured.

I don't know if I'm qualified to compare Americans to Europeans, but many Americans really are enamored with money and judge material wealth as the be all and end all goal of life.


When you live without a real safety net, no amount of money is ever enough to guarantee anything whatsoever. Plus decades of doing what you have to do to survive at all and not end up being a victim of such a system powerfully shapes your psychology. It's hard to just put it down one day after your net worth hits $X.


> There are plenty of people in America who continue to chase money long after their safe retirement is assured.

That's probably because, over time, you become what you practice. So, even if you were not obsessed with money and work at 20, you might be at 40, after 20 years of chasing money and success to stave off potential disasters.


As an American I can say that we value human character over wealth. Most true wealthy Americans, those who have more than what they owe and still have a lot left over to to live comfortably are not enamored by money. They are enamored with survival, leaving money behind to their family, and philanthropy. And of course nice experiences (like a good meal and at good restaurant) and a few toys (typically centered around one or two hobbies, way of life). I might be way biased though with my assessment.


> There are plenty of people in America who continue to chase money long after their safe retirement is assured.

I mean take a look at rich (m/b)illionaires. It's a life style they can't give up.


> that is really callous and unmerciful compared to other places in the world

like Europe, which has a level of public spending that many view as unsustainably high?

Edit: plenty of economists are saying this! It's hardly a controversial view


The US is #15 on the debt relative to GDP country list according to [1,2]. So you are saying in the US "spending is unsustainably high" AND "life is really callous and unmerciful" at once?

[1] https://www.gfmag.com/global-data/economic-data/public-debt-...

[2] Sorted: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vTcH12ah_hJh...


No. I'm saying that the idea that the European model is the solution is simplistic at best.


Northern Europe or Mediterranean Europe? Greece and Italy are a mess, but the North's budgets look a lot better than the U.S.'s does.


Well let's be generous and also include Portugal and Spain for good measure, both of which have seen an entire generation's prospects suffer massive harm due to EU (eurozone) policy. It's always funny to me how blithely the destruction of millions of people's lives and potential is waved away when it doesn't fit the narrative.

And then lets take a look at the North: Germany employs the Euro to support its economy by decreasing the true cost of its exports, resulting in the impoverishment of the southern European countries already mentioned. France's economy has been facing calls for major reform for decades now and - not sure if you've missed it - the latest economy related political problems have led to a minor civil war. Both economies also now face the prospect of integrating millions of low-skilled, penniless new arrivals. Those are the two biggest economies by far in the EU (if UK leaves). And then there's no shortage of other economies snapping at Europe's heels, all perfectly capable of manufacturing products that are equal if not superior to what comes out of Europe. Many think that German automotive engineering dropped off a cliff in terms of quality in the early 2000s and never really recovered, as a consequence of superior quality from Japan and Korea. And now China are just starting to penetrate Western markets with cars that are plenty good enough.

Also don't forget the Euro does not have the privilege of being the world's reserve currency. This gives the US a massive advantage and lessens the impact of deficits.

I live in one of these high benefit economies and having been taxed for years feel I'm owed something in return. But I don't expect it. Given the trends afoot I think anyone below 50 in Europe that thinks the welfare state will continue to be like it is now over their lifetime is utterly delusional.


I mean, US public spending is already unsustainably high.


They seem to have sustained this far.


The turkey said that same thing the day before Thanksgiving.

The OP might be incorrect, but you are using the wrong argument against theirs.


If the title of the article is anything to go by, it will be mere luck if one system services and another doesn’t.


Yes? If you work with it every day you forget how obtuse and opaque programming can be. Most normal people barely understand basic consumer electronics.


Programming is like many things not an immensely difficult task, but it is one that requires knowledge and experience, so a true novice confronted with a SQL manual would not be able to quickly write the right code. Someone who's done programming before would have a much easier time.


Fromsoft is a great example of how you don't HAVE to make cheap, lowest common denominator shit and you can still be really successful. But it takes a lot more work and arguably a genius at the helm (Miyazaki) so we're going to keep seeing most companies take the cheap route.


I would guess in the first case, they confiscate your stuff and detain you, and in the second case, they dont give a fuck


It sounds like you need some perspective. You have more wealth than nearly everyone else on Earth. What more do you want?


> You have more wealth than nearly everyone else on Earth.

But huge swaths of the earth are in poverty and have entirely different costs of living.

A more relevant measure... they have more wealth than the vast majority of San Francisco itself - 80th percentile household income in SF is $190k according to https://statisticalatlas.com/place/California/San-Francisco/...


Just curious, what sort of source would you expect for that? An article from Manager's Monthly about tips on tricking your employees to do free work?


ah. I see now what's gone wrong. I thought I commented on the parent comment about

> under the (mistaken) belief that more hours = more software. reply

I'd delete it if I could.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: