Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | redblacktree's comments login

I am confused by this comment too. I don't recall ever being asked to pay for Netscape. (not that I would have, at 12ish)

I clearly remember it being boxed and on a shelf along side Internet Explorer for like $40 at CompUSA. Nearly an entire isle for browsers.

Yes, that was for people who didn’t know how to connect to Netscape’s official FTP server and download it directly

I remember it was originally paid for (i vaguely remember seeing an ad in a pc mag) but by 1996 I got it for free

It was never required to pay for it. As was common with software back then, the free download was a fully featured "evaluation" version denoted by an "N" appended to the version number. That didn't last long though and it just stayed free.

There was a "Gold" version they sold at retail for some time that had a WYSIWYG editor in it, until they made it standard as part of the Communicator suite.


"If you were dreaming in Minecraft" is the impression that I get. It feels very much like a dream with the lack of object permanence. Also interesting is light level. If you stare at something dark for a while or go "underwater" and get to the point where the screen is black, it's difficult to get back to anything but a black screen. (I didn't manage it in my one playthrough)

Very odd sensation indeed.


Does something similar exist for LLM/GPT?

Edit to add: I'm mostly interested in this aspect:

"The target audience of this tutorial includes [those] who are interested in [...] applying these models to solve other problems."


Andrej Karpathy has a youtube playlist:

https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLAqhIrjkxbuWI23v9cThs...

He is building new learning materials under his new company "Eureka Labs":

https://eurekalabs.ai

Sebastian Raschka's book "Build a Large Language Model (From Scratch) just released:

https://www.manning.com/books/build-a-large-language-model-f...

All of these resources are excellent.


Andrej Karpathy has very good video tutorials on how to write your own GPT: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCc8FmEb1nY


This is excellent


3Blue1Brown has a pretty great video series walking through Transformers:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjZofJX0v4M


Even if it isn't designed this way, it's a welcome benefit to many.


Do you have data on which data is in higher demand? Do you keep a list of frequently-requested datasets?


That's not how tax brackets work, but it is a common misconception. If you salary goes up, your take-home goes up, full stop.

If you are making $191,950/year (the very top end of the 24% bracket for 2024) you will pay $39,110.50 in federal income tax, (before any deductions) for a net of $152,839.50. (You may notice that this is less than 24%) If you make an additional $1,000/year: $192,950, only the additional $1,000 is taxed at the 32% rate. Which makes your total federal income tax bill $320 more, and improving your net take-home to $153,519.50

Edit to add: I'm disappointed that sibling comments to mine are so degrading. We all had to learn this at some point.


There are cases where if your salary goes up, your take-home goes down, especially for lower income levels. It’s just not on the basis of tax brackets. There are means-tested benefits that you can lose if you cross certain income levels where an increase in income of $5 can cost you thousands of dollars.


Yup. Most are for lower income levels but some affect middle class & up as well

(electric vehicle credits, financial aid for university, first time homeowner credits, or affordable homeownership breaks... etc)


I'm not disappointed. This is a classic case of someone who knows nothing about a topic making confident statements that will undoubtedly spread. People who do this should absolutely be ridiculed to discourage spreading total nonsense.

And to be clear we're not talking about some esoteric subject -- this is the most basic part of how your salary is taxed by the US government.


How did you pull your medical records?


I believe it's a legal right to request them. I sent them an official form requesting them, and they sent them to me, as I wanted to transfer my old records to a new doctor. These were old style records, nowadays most of that stuff will be automatically on some type of web portal.


I think you can just ask your doctor for them? Why would someone deny you your own medical records?


I wasn't thinking that it would be denied. My curiosity was more with respect to how easy or difficult it is to request them.


One example I often run into: Plaid (the bank-linking company) doesn't work. Just hangs. Though I'll admit it's possible they fixed it. I've been trained to use Chrome when I have to interact with it.


I mean, the tense and sinister-sounding violin music helps with that feeling as well.


I was so engrossed in the animation that I didn't notice the music.


Yet the music made me feel so uncomfortable..


I don't have first-hand experience, but I own a couple of short-term rentals, and the word on the street in the hosts community is that booking.com (BDC) is full of scammers and not worth the effort to integrate with.


This makes me wonder where you get your word from? Booking is well established since a very long time, if a host is problematic you'll see it in the reviews. If they're scams they get removed from booking. For clients there is no way for them to scam a host.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: