I can't say for others, but this is what I do since Google integrated AI to the search results. For 80% of the time, I'd just type a question and read the AI summary and stop going further. For the other 20% or so when I believe deep diving is important, I'd scroll through results in the first page and click on a few of them to find out the "facts" myself.
The latter is what I used to do before AI summary was a thing, so I would logically assume that it should reduce the clicks to individual sites?
More like you can find the Google ai summary and then the first and only page of results are SEO optimized ai summaries by content mills. Original content is long lost and taken offline due to lack of revenue
It's okay to lose touch with former friends (that is, to not feel guilty). This is part of life and I'm always convinced that my friends, whom I lost contact with, will understand as well.
Plus, although we were friends at one point due to common interests, shared environment, etc., we grow up and apart. If chances collide, we will cross paths with some of them.
During my thirties, I felt a bit guilty about not keeping in touch with most of my friends from high school and college. As I reached mid-forties, I have learned to live with the above realization. I think I'd have a good chat with some of my old friends when I meet them by happenstance again.
Friendship requires proximity. Very hard to maintain a friendship or any relationship with physical distance or even just mostly disjoint social circles. Nothing to feel guilty about, it's how we work.
This is clearly false as plenty of long-term long-distance friendships exist. It does make it harder, but there's a difference between "harder" and "impossible".
I have several multi-decade friendships where we have no friends in common and either never met in person or met only a few times.
Looks good and a step in the right direction (speaking as someone who thinks the modern day trucks are getting too big for the danger of those driving alongside them on the roads).
I wonder though if the interior trim can be ordered without this felt-like material. I can easily see that being stained or dirty in a short period of time. I am sure there is.
Spouse of an oncology trainee here. This is an accurate statement. But whenever you mention similar thing on public forums like HN or Reddit, you get downvoted. I have a feeling that a lot of pre-meds, current medical residents and doctors (and their families) hang out in those forums and downvote everything that is stating the truth.
My wife is going to make $400K+ minimum (if she does more than one day per week on-call, she will make easily $500K/year; on-call for oncology aren't difficult btw) when she's done with the fellowship. We both came from Burma (Myanmar), and she told me how unnecessarily expensive everything with medicine in the US is (including the number of years required to train to become a generic/internal medicine doctor in the US).
She is also unhappy with the fact that doctors are acting as unnecessary gatekeeper for a lot of medicines that are fairly safe to use (and are available for over-the-counter purchase in other countries like India and Burma). We have a lot of doctor friends in the US, so we know the "industry" very well. Doctors (along with pharma and insurance companies) are at least somewhat complicit in the ever-increasing prices in the US. AMA (American Medical Association) spent $24M+ in 2024 for lobbying [ https://www.opensecrets.org/federal-lobbying/clients/summary... ] while pharma spent 30-40x more in lobbying [ https://www.opensecrets.org/news/reports/layers-of-lobbying ].
Side note: yesterday, my wife's department (a fairly large hospital in LA metro area) was treated with steaks by pharma reps from cancer medicine company. A lot of doctors, residents and fellows were delighted with that meal to say the least. I have been to expensive (Wagyu-beef expensive) hot pot dinner hosted by another pharmacy company when my wife was just an intern at a private clinic.
Just one data point to add -- the small firm (~150 ppl) I'm currently working at recently laid off 25 people. The reasoning was there are dark clouds in the horizon in the housing market (the company is related to real estate btw).
Not from my experience. I've worked with all three of them. If one can stick with the web UI to provision permissions and the permissions required are simple/straightforward, Google Cloud (again, this is my personal opinion, so please take it with a grain of salt) is the most usable among the three.
BUT all three of them (AWS, Azure and GCP) have pros and cons, so you just have to spend a good amount of time learning their quirks.
I've been using Windows since 95, and I dislike the fact that Windows nowadays hide a lot of options in context menu. That means I almost always have to click on 'Show more options' to do what I need. Also, Windows Explorer is laggier and it feels like they just slapped a web-page like UI on top of an existing (legacy) code base. I feel like Microsoft hired a bunch of UX/UI designers who never properly learned the principles of UI and try to do the right (logical) thing for the users.
With people talking about ads and such, I'm reluctant to get a new computer with Windows 11.
Explorer around Win98, I think as part of IE4, got the capability of hosting a web page in an explorer window (or part of it anyway for things like showing details) but it wasn't the control used for actually navigating through files. They did try and simulate it by allowing files to be single click to open and giving them blue underlines. MS kept using good ol' list views up through today for most of it. It is in the newer experiences where they're thrashing about and adding galleries, suggestions, and whatever will get someone promoted.
I am also concerned about couple of important things: human skill erosion (a lot of new devs who use AI might not bother to learn the basics that can make a difference in production/performance, security, etc.), and human laziness (and thus, gradually growing the habit to trust/rely on AI's output entirely).
reply