A lot of debate here is debating a social media ban. But what actually being banned is accounts, not access.
Australian teens can still scroll TikTok, Instagram, and watch Twitch streams from logged out accounts. They just can't comment, like, or upload their own content.
One might argue that this removes the algorithmic feeds. But I would wager that social media companies will just use browser fingerprinting to continue to serve algorithmic content to logged out users, if they aren't doing this already.
My take. This ruling seems to impact the content creators (from Australia specifically) more than the content viewers. Which I'm not sure is the intent of the legislation.
I don't use social media but from occasionally trying to look at a link someone has sent me, the experience of viewing these sites without being logged in is very limited. If you can see anything, it's maybe one post and then you get a popup demanding that you log in to see more or view the whole thread.
> But what actually being banned is accounts, not access.
Is this implied, or is this detailed in the law? I can see why this would make sense. So many businesses just have a link to their facebook page as their business website, which you should still be able to view. And presuming platforms like YouTube fit the definition, banning kids from watching anything on there would be pretty rough.
> One might argue that this removes the algorithmic feeds. But I would wager that social media companies will just use browser fingerprinting to continue to serve algorithmic content to logged out users, if they aren't doing this already.
On the subject of YouTube, I wonder if they would allow for the creation of teen accounts, which restrict all social media functions but allow subscriptions. But would that then also remove algorithmic recommendations? What about data harvesting off those accounts? If so, I might have to look up how to get a teenage fake ID.
> browser fingerprinting to continue to serve algorithmic content to logged out users, if they aren't doing this already
This is going to be a poor substitute. New browser, updated browser, lost cookies, new phone, different device... Those all will reset your algorithm and the companies will have a hard time tracking down data they can associate with you.
Interesting! Seems there is a very similar format by Microsoft called `.prompty`. Maybe I'll work on a PR to support either `.prompt` or `.prompty` files.
I wonder if part of the reason they haven't released on Windows is because Edge has a lot of these features with Copilot. E.g. Copilot Vision and Copilot Actions.
May I also suggest the [freeCodeCamp.org Code Radio][1]. They actually had a [recording artist contribute and curate most of the beats under a creative license][2].
You forgot to mention my favorite dual-pane file manager for Windows: [FreeCommander](http://freecommander.com/).
I know fman is still pretty young, so for now I'm sticking with FreeCommander. Also, fman was too slow using Windows network drives which I have to use at work. Local files are fine. Plus, there are a few features of FreeCommander that I can't live without including the tab interface, multi-file renamer, built-in archive handling, and many more. Although fman does look like a cool project, hopefully it will catch up in terms of speed and functionality with user-provided plugins.
