If people were using my backyard to sell drugs or CSAM, I knew it, and did nothing about it, I would absolutely be guilty of facilitating these crimes. I fail to see how the situation is different for Pasha.
> if the government knows about someone selling drugs and does nothing about it, you can sue the government.
at least in the US, there are only a few limited times the government is open to civil litigation - and nonenforcement of the law is not usually one of them
If you were the one hosting it on your own server and storing CSAM that people were sending, yeah, you should be arrested. Nobody cares if you upload a messenger to github, there's scores of them.
i think it is an analogy that is useful in elucidating what people view as the morally relevant aspect.
i don’t think it makes a ton of sense to me that the encryption or lack thereof is the relevant factor - if we think that proprietors of unencrypted messaging should be required to turn over chat logs, then encrypted messaging should probably be illegal or we have left a massive loophole in.
the scale being the relevant issue is another thing as well. i worry that if you somehow create a protocol for dencentralized messaging, you somehow then become liable for misuse of what could have been an academic project, etc.
You mean if you’re also running servers for it that store all the data in a format you can read and refuse law enforcement requests in your jurisdiction.
This is a horrible analogy, is your side project giving free cloud hosting of up to 1.5GB files for 900 million users with no moderation? Yeah, if it is you should go to jail too if you didn't address the issue of CSAM there for a decade.
I believe what the author has in mind is the fact that you need to create your LSI at the same time as you create the table, you cannot add them later (until GSI). So there's some truth to what they are saying regarding access patterns.
That's a good point, and I'd add that, in the opposite direction, running a simulation can be a good way to convince yourself that your analytical solution is correct.
There is a whole industry centered around this practice of grabbing expired domains, putting back the content based on internet archive snapshots, and using the SEO juice to help rank money sites. Nobody will read these blogs, it's just for google crawler's eyes.
I think there may be issue with data collection. I tried listening to some of pg's articles but they were cut off right in the beginning, see e.g. 005 Lisp for Web Applications.
Sounds like a different offer. interviewing.io prepares you for interviews, while the triplebyte reboot is a way for companies to outsource their interview process. I think it makes a lot of sense. Interviewing, or, more generally, filtering the 1% of good candidates, is a difficult task and could be indeed a job in itself.
The company has a strong incentive to take this job seriously since they will acquire a reputation after some time and will lose clients if it turns out they are being too lenient.
reply