Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jest7325's comments login

This tool will help you find weaknesses in your website setup. It will also make sure that your website is powerful enough to receive spikes of users. If you are using Cloudflare it will make sure that your Cloudflare is configured properly.

Clouflare and none Cloudlare users are welcome to try.

Can you please try the free test and send me some feedback?


How many qubit does it take to crack an AES 192 key?


For AES, the quantum advantage is merely grover's algorithm, which allows you to invert a function in O(sqrt(N)) time instead of O(N) time. Basically, the algorithm would look like "compute AES-192 on a uniform random quantum state, then do Grover's algorithm for 2^96 timesteps." This needs as many qubits as it takes to compute AES-192 (which, since the algorithm isn't unitary, is strictly greater than 192 qubits).

More important is the fact that it's a very long-running application: it requires to you keep over 192 qubits coherent for a very long time, which is probably an order of magnitude or more in error correction requirements.


Most postulations I've seen follow the axiom that the number of qubits must be no less than twice the number of bits used to generate the key. I found a pretty good summary of that thinking on StackExchange: https://security.stackexchange.com/questions/87345/how-many-...


A lot, considering you'd need 2^96 quantum operations.


It might be fast but does it handle load? Did you try to benchmark it with a service like https://ddostest.me


Don't be afraid to shake things or the industry but always stay on the bright side. The line is very thin between: I am trying to help and improve security in contrast with I am threatening you. Some people or Business could feel threatened depending on the wordings used when approaching them.


Genius is one percent inspiration, ninety-nine percent perspiration. - Thomas Edison

It's not so original and it sounds like it was copied/pasted from an old quote 100 years ago


Linus literally talks about Edison and that quote in the article


I suspect the original Edison quote is so widely familiar, that a conspicuous modification is a sort of play on words that doesn't require citing the original.


I wonder if it would make sense to front-end that with nginx. It has nice http2 and the latest SSL/TLS implementation. Just curious what other think about this approach.


That's currently what is done. However the idea that I could get my entire stack, from HTTP handler, to router, to logic, to database query, back to response into a single 10mb binary is pretty enticing.

If I could get there, I'd have full control over every aspect of an API request from packet to server query, back to payload, in a single programming language, in a single conceptual framework. There is a lot to like about that. I'm not sure it's needed - nginx works so well, and perfect settings are just a single config file away. But if I could get to a truly single-binary deployment, I'd be pretty happy too.


literally the first sentence of the post:

> Back when crypto/tls was slow and net/http young, the general wisdom was to always put Go servers behind a reverse proxy like NGINX. That’s not necessary anymore!


I believe there are times when you can also learn from others' mistakes. I remember the book The count of Monte Cristo and it's about a long and slow revenge. I hope your story will have a good ending!


Interesting talk and I am wondering if the op tried load-balanced algorithm like "leastresponsetime" and "leastconnection"? Today LB are pretty advanced and sometimes are even not even used in technology like ecmp.


I use Vultr and there are some DC that are more stable than other. Generally speaking it's worth what you pay for and I can't complaint.


It's a bit strange that the VPS would have something to do with it. What I mean is that Digitalocean is basically sitting side by side with google. I ping'ed google from the NY3 and I get really fast response time.

booteNg1iethahb8uh

Oops that was my password that I pasted... here is the good paste.

root@debian-512mb-nyc3-01:~# ping www.google.com PING www.google.com (172.217.4.36) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from lga15s46-in-f4.1e100.net (172.217.4.36): icmp_seq=1 ttl=59 time=2.36 ms

64 bytes from lga15s46-in-f4.1e100.net (172.217.4.36): icmp_seq=2 ttl=59 time=2.44 ms


Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: