Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | goric's commentslogin

IMO this climb doesn't really do much to prove of xenon's effectiveness (altitude researcher Dr. Peter Hackett says as much [0]).

The team used supplemental oxygen on the climb, with the starting altitude and flow rate not being reported [1]. This is speculative, but if they were using more oxygen than typical and starting at a lower altitude, that's a massive advantage.

Further, Andrew Ushakov traveled from NYC to the summit in just under 4 days this year without the use of xenon (but also with supplemental oxygen with unknown starting altitude and flow rate). He used a hypoxic tent to prepare as well, and depending on the accuracy of the reporting may have even spent less time doing that than the xenon team did [1].

[0] https://www.npr.org/2025/05/18/nx-s1-5398553/a-new-company-i...

[1] https://www.alanarnette.com/blog/2025/05/21/everest-2025-fas...


I believe the Xenon team also did hypoxic tents


IMO this climb doesn't really do much to prove of xenon's effectiveness (altitude researcher Dr. Peter Hackett says as much [0]).

The team used supplemental oxygen on the climb, with the starting altitude and flow rate not being reported [1]. This is speculative, but if they were using more oxygen than typical and starting at a lower altitude, that's a massive advantage.

Further, Andrew Ushakov traveled from NYC to the summit in just under 4 days this year without the use of xenon (but also with supplemental oxygen with unknown starting altitude and flow rate). He used a hypoxic tent to prepare as well, and depending on the accuracy of the reporting may have even spent less time doing that than the xenon team did [1].

[0] https://www.npr.org/2025/05/18/nx-s1-5398553/a-new-company-i... [1] https://www.alanarnette.com/blog/2025/05/21/everest-2025-fas...


There's an interesting blog post[0] that calls this concept The Copenhagen Interpretation of Ethics.

[0] (the original no longer loads for me, so here's an archive) https://web.archive.org/web/20230105070226/https://blog.jaib...


Typically also implies that the object contains no real logic/functionality and is a simple container for storing some values. Something that could be a record type.


I think of "plain old" as meaning "not having dependencies on any framework" as opposed to "not inheriting from anything" or "not having logic".


Hopcroft, Motwani, and Ullman's Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation by is another classic text


If you found this interesting, see also Norvig's Sudoku Solver [1], with an implementation in Python.

[1] http://norvig.com/sudoku.html


DeadAIM [1] was one such hack. I remember it also provided the ability to manually change your status to anything, including invisible.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DeadAIM


That's exactly what I was looking for, thanks! I remember that hack fondly. It made things so much easier.


More specifically, a straddle: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straddle


While I don't totally disagree, I interpret the "same thing" referred to in your quote and the "same reason" he's failing as two different levels of the concept of sameness. In my mind the insanity quote applies to a much stricter sense of repetitiveness (e.g. trying and failing on the same project/idea while using the same approach over and over) than repeatedly attempting to reach financial independence via different side projects.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: