Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | gabiruh's commentslogin

It's interesting how some features, such as green grass, a blue sky, clouds, and the sun, are ubiquitous among all of these models' responses.

If you were a pelican, wouldn't you want to go cycling on a sunny day?

Do electric pelicans dream of touching electric grass?


Do electric pelicans dream of touching electric grass?

That would be shocking news to me.


Please leave the Internet :)

It is odd, yeah.

I'm guessing both humans and LLMs would tend to get the "vibe" from the pelican task, that they're essentially being asked to create something like a child's crayon drawing. And that "vibe" then brings with it associations with all the types of things children might normally include in a drawing.


It's weird that the "airplane mode" seems to be ON on the phone during the entire presentation.


This was on purpose - they connected it to the internet via a USB-C cable it appears, for consistent internet instead of having it switch WiFi

Probably some kinks there they are working out


> Probably some kinks there they are working out

Or just a good idea for a live demo on a congested network/environment with a lot of media present, at least one live video stream (the one we're watching the recording of), etc.

At least that's how I understood it, not that they had a problem with it (consistently or under regular conditions, or specific to their app).


That's very common practice for live demos. To avoid situations like this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lqfRx61BUg


And eliminate the change of some prankster affecting the demo by attacking the wifi.


They mention at the beginning of the video that they are using hardwired internet for reliability reasons.


You would want to make sure that it is always going over WiFi for the demo and doesn't start using the cellular network for a random reason.


You can turn off mobile data. They probably just wanted wired internet.


drugdeal.ing was cheap, though...


Yeah... a couple GIFs would.

If I was them I would've just embedded this video from "Emacs Rocks!":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D6h5dFyyUX0

It shows how incredible paredit is.


Wow! That looks pretty amazing. Makes we wish I used both a lisp and emacs... Does anyone know if there is anything similar that works for non-lispy languages (using syntax like do/end, {}, etc?) and in VSCode?


I like Perl's Data::ParseBinary (https://metacpan.org/pod/Data::ParseBinary)

    my $s = Struct("foo",
        UBInt8("a"),
        UBInt16("b"),
        Struct("bar",
            UBInt8("a"),
            UBInt16("b"),
        )
    );
    my $data = $s->parse("ABBabb");
    # $data is { a => 65, b => 16962, bar => { a => 97, b => 25186 } }


How does it handle length-prefixed data?

  length u32
  data   u32[length]
This is a huge problem for traditional parsers since the input modifies the grammar dynamically.



I see, you can pass in a function that computes the length. I wonder if a declarative or formal solution will ever exist.


Yeah. That’s pure Dog-whistle politics.


Can anyone explain...?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dog-whistle_politics

By saying that they can scan buried ancient sites it resonates to the "enemy" that they can see everything it is trying to hide.

What, at a first glance, may sound like celebrating science is just warfare.


I know what the term "dog-whistle" means. The parent comment you responded to is "TIL there's a place called the Firth of Clyde", what is the dog whistle in that name?


Yeah.. that got me thinking too. I would not have called it "new".

As of version 5.10, Perl regex engine implements a complete recursive-descent parsing. Allowing things like Regexp::Grammars[0] to exist. Perl also has a nice PEG parser framework called Pegex[1]

-- [0] - https://metacpan.org/pod/Regexp::Grammars [1] - https://metacpan.org/pod/Pegex


Shit.. that's almost exactly how I've been doing since I was a kid. The difference is that I do the other way around, starting from my feet.


Is this guy nuts? I'm on iOS 4.3 and I only need to hit the home button twice in a row to get from Safari to the home screen. One hit to send Safari background, and another hit to scroll from the current screen to home screen.


If so your Safari is not in a folder.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: