Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | bkummel's comments login

I'm not sure whether the result is more readable than a UUID. With a UUID you at least know that it can only be [0-9A-F]. Besides, who on earth _types_ API keys? You should copy/paste them and store them in a password manager. So they don't _need_ to be readable.

+1

Don't. There are more modern and superior solutions like e.g. Discourse. I don't see why people should use old-fashioned things like mailing lists in 2024.


I do not have to time to hang about in forums, nor to idle on Discord or IRC.

E-mail, on the other hand, is a constant. I can snooze it, read it on Emacs, file it with custom rules, deal with it however I want. It doesn't require any particular app, any particular form of formatting, it doesn't give me points, badges, weekly recap emails, or require me to upload an avatar.

I feel mailing lists are underrated, and reading from this thread, it's mostly because the software to run them is as intuitive as Sendmail.


Note that Discourse can be used in "mailing list mode", so you don't have to leave Emacs.


Discourse has terrible UX compared to other online forums and even mailing lists.

Your claim that it's superior needs to clarify exactly what is superior about it.


Is Discourse easily searchable from the outside? I was looking up transaction behavior in Postgrsql last night. I came across such an old school mailing list. The utility was that it appeared rather high in the search results.


The OpenStreetMap community decided to go the discourse route after a review of requirements and options available.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Community_forum

Talk about discourse for OpenStreetMap: https://www.youtube.com/live/VkZJd-4C1Ws


In my experience, Discourse forums do appear high in search results as well. The added benefit is that they have a good UI to read old threads, unlike mailing lists.


discuss.python.org comes up in my search results, sure.


Reminder: 'modern' and 'old-fashioned' are political epithets, not measurable quantites.


Sounds like an important breakthrough!

Side note: in the article, I find it a bit inappropriate that the first paragraphs only talk about the effects on the stock prices of both involved companies, before going into details of the research and how the vaccine works…


That's how financial news is structured.

Science news go in the opposite order.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: