For this to become true, agents first have to transcend 'chatbot' as the primary interaction layer.
There's a reason we're still using apps instead of talking to Siri…for a huge number of tasks, visual UIs are so much more efficient than long-form text.
Chrome bookmarks also show up as items in the Bookmarks menu, which means you can use the built-in macOS functionality to assign your own custom keyboard shortcuts in System Preferences → Keyboard.
> Consistent with the ACM’s order, dating apps that are granted an entitlement to link out or use a third-party in-app payment provider will pay Apple a commission on transactions.
The other difference is that Google Maps has to build everything into the app directly. The privacy label for Apple Maps gets a 'free ride' on so many things by virtue of piggybacking on OS-level functionality.
Same thing applies to Messages vs. WhatsApp/Messenger and bunch of others.
Genius move for Twilio, honestly. Segment can supply the central hub to tie in all channel spokes Twilio already powers (especially after the SendGrid acquisition from a couple years ago).
I can't help thinking Segment had much more room to run though...everyone I know who uses them loves them, and they were still only just scratching the surface of the addressable market.
Agreed really good fit. I bet a large % of Segment's customers were using Twilio endpoints. Really nice combination of a data hub / last mile across multiple channels...fully expect they will continue moving up the stack towards a CRM / Marketing automation solution.
Segment published a report on tool usage. "SMS and Push" was @ 12% and was not in the top-10. Even in the "SMS and Push", there was Braze/Iterable etc but no Twillio.
This is not surprising. The personalized SMS/push notification use cases (for which you need Segment data) are commonly implemented via marketing platforms (like Braze etc) as opposed to directly via Twillio.
I think this was the other way around. Twillio is powering a lot of these new age marketing automation tools. Instead of just being at the infrastructure layer, it wants to go up the stack and own the marketing applications. Sendgrid and now Segment acqusitions are part of the same strategy.
They did the same thing for the contact center (call center) software space. Lot of the cloud contact center companies were using Twillio and now they launched their own contact center product. That has been one of the key drivers in their 3x increase in valuation in the last 1 yr.
It's a bit like Amazon with it's branded meatspace products or AWS properties which can be directly sourced/inspired by by their own down-stream / customer data. They don't even need to look into traffic, just look at your best/top paying customers, and copy them
Sigh!
At least Twilio buys Segment, not just copies it I guess..
Who’s a likely candidate for CRM acquisition? Seems like the space is a bit crowded and Salesforce is the big dog and lots of second tier but who’s a good fit for Twilio?
There’s also Vero and Iterable that I’ve used. Iterable was pretty terrible and we ended up replacing it with in house tooling, Vero has been really great and we’re investing more in our Vero setup.
The other case is they didn’t want to deal with going through an IPO, got a great offer for their business and a major liquidity event for their employees.
Going public, despite profits made, really sucks the soul out of a company.
Twilio and Segment’s visions align pretty well so I think that played a role as well. Outside of golden handcuffs, a large portion of their employees are liquid immediately as opposed to an IPO with a 6-12 month lockup for employees plus the rise/fall of a stock price during that time.
All in all, I think they made the right choice to sell instead of going for an IPO.
If they could show strong growth continuing they'd have made more money with an IPO than an acquisition. At least that's what the comment is suggesting.
> I am really surprised that big publishers are not bothered by this fact as much as I am.
I suspect they are just as bothered, but don't really have a choice about this either. Placement on the search results page is so valuable that Google holds a really big stick when introducing new 'standards' like this.
Just look how little of a typical mobile SERP is real 'organic' content now: http://imgur.com/UhNZvL2
This will be very helpful for anyone with an app who wants to break their users out of Google's AMP viewer.
Using Universal Links for it is helpful — other AMP banners I've seen so far (Reuters, etc [1]) just redirect users to the App Store even when the app is installed...a little bit frustrating.
For small teams, this can definitely be true. At least in the beginning.
For better or worse, the native app UX advantage still pays off massively in real dollars. And with walled gardens like Facebook and Google AMP growing so quickly, building a native app of your own is often the best chance to capture an audience.
Varasano also rejects the "special water" claim. I think the historically poor quality of pizza in rural areas is due to the "trade secret" recipe factors (which Varasano identifies) not being widely shared.
I've been to small towns with a "House of Pizza" that made an awful flavorless and bready crust, and the locals loved it because they had no reference for anything better.
Yeah, it's probably mainly New York's intense competition that has made the pizza excellent. Unless you're in Times Square and have lots of tourists to prey on, you just can't pay the rent if you make bad food in NYC, it's too easy to find (and walk to) 10 other restaurants making the same thing.
There's a reason we're still using apps instead of talking to Siri…for a huge number of tasks, visual UIs are so much more efficient than long-form text.