Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | Digit-Al's comments login

Same for me. I get the following messages in the console:

Loading failed for the <script> with source “https://streets.gl/js/index.js”. streets.gl:1:940 A resource is blocked by OpaqueResponseBlocking, please check browser console for details. script.js Loading failed for the <script> with source “https://analytics.streets.gl/js/script.js”. streets.gl:1:815


Same here, Firefox on a Debian machine and firefox just finished updating...

Don't know if they mandate it, but I know a few people who use either names that are a slight modification of their real name, or completely made up names.

I spent years designing interfaces for Windows Forms applications. There is no neccessity for sharing to be a dialog - it should be a wizard; and could even open in a new tab in a web application. Then the user can cancel either by pressing the cancel button (which would close the tab) or by just closing the tab. Selecting who to add, or adding a new person then just become pages in the wizard.


Yeah everything theoretically could be done without dialogs, but the beauty of dialogs is that they can keep you from losing your place in what you're doing "behind" them, before they opened. Modal dialogs are less disorienting to users than just taking to some other "page", because they can tell what they're currently working on is still there behind the dialog.


Can't decide if the people downvoting you don't realise the irony, or are deliberately downvoting you for the irony.


The proof is not in the pudding. The proof of the pudding is in the eating.


I've had the opposite experience. My current TV is a Samsung and has been going for many years with no problems whatsoever. My last TV was also a Samsung and I only replaced it (after many years of use) because I wanted a bigger and better TV. I also have a Samsung fridge, and that has been going about 5 years with no issues.


Evidently I touched a nerve of somewhat strong opinion. I suppose the intended reference to the Tab and Note 7 might have been made more overt.


The difference is this: No EULA can override an organisation's legal obligations. Most countries have fairly robust "fit for use" laws, so if you sell something and it is not fit for use you can be taken to court. If there is no sale then there is no "fit for use" protection.

I do not mean this to imply I think commercial software is superior to free software, I am a great believer in FOSS, I just wnat to show a reason why a "scary" warning in commercial software is not equivalent to the same warning in FOSS.


You are correct. Github's license terms are a hedge against that sort of thing. They are basically saying "the person making this source available is granting the license to d these particular things" - therefore, the user making the source available takes on the responsibility for making sure they actually have the authority to make this source available. If they do not have this authority then they are the ones that will be sued - not Github nor any users who cloned the code.


Just switch to reader mode the moment it loads and you can beat the paywall.


If you want to receive the health benefits from the tea then you should brew for at least four minutes, I've heard. This does only really apply if the tea is of at least reasonable quality, of course.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: