(the large switch table replacing a lookup)
Its not that esoteric, maintaining switches is more
intuitive and flexible than dealing with rigid lookup
table logic.
Although it is a common case, changing the lookup to use an explicit array is a simple fix for code that relies on this optimization. Even non-consecutive ranges are often straightforward to handle with C array designators (standardized for 25 years now!)
This strange reliance on Discord as some sort
of "escape from web3.0" is silly to anyone who
knows what Discord is(modern AOL) and how centralized it is.
Its just the same corporate walled garden
with more echochambery isolation.
Is AI part of "web 3.0"? I thought web 3.0 was decentralized/blockchain stuff.
I mention Discord because a lot of people use it for stuff that would formerly be forums. Telegram is also the the same. They're doing this despite it being centralized. What's the decentralized equivalent of Discord or Telegram? Does it support phone notifications?
That's enough CO2 to make 22.7 billion metric tons of cellulose per year, or ~2.8 tons per capita for Earth's 8.2 billion people. That's too much to to turn it all into furniture or even buildings.
Just for scale how tons of carbon are in an acre or hectare of corn, wheat, or other crop. Being able to say how many farms would need to do this to counter act our release could provide an interesting sanity check.
I’d wager the furniture industry is currently responsible for a significant % of anual deforestation, which as far as I know isn’t regrowing fast enough.
An approach like this could benefit from crops which are not productive for humanity otherwise, but which grows much faster and eats CO2 cheaper than trees.
Does that mean “stop replanting forests?” Absolutely not.
The amount of sigils and occult jargon
math invents on the spot is very weird
in context of most sciences:
imagine creating entire fields/theories
and gaining followers, like a religious sect,
in a field like geometry?
(Author) For specific keywords, yes, technically you could, but it would require making a separate glyph for each word, which would inflate the file size and require a lot of manual effort for no apparent upside. The substituting logic is as rigid as with calts. Unless you had some other idea how to use ligatures?
The Template pack index is going to make
meta-template variadics much easier.
Usually this is prone to cludges like converting
parameters to structs or filtering them with functions holding the pack.
it seems there are 5 different kinds of uses of "...".
1. typename...
2. sizeof...
3. values...
4. T... representing multiple parameters in the formal parameter list.
5. T... for the type of the pack (supporting T...[0], the new feature).
I don't have a big point, I'm just mildly amused. Even with the simplifying new syntax, it took me a while to work through what is what in the example.
I wonder why it's T...[0] and not just T[0]? In parameter lists you need the distinction between "T", a single parameter of pack type, and "T...", multiple parameters supplied from the pack. But I don't see a similar need in an expression.
I think for types you could do without the dots in T...[0], but it mirrors the usage for values (values...[0] is different from (values[0]...). So consistency I guess.
the one-to-many model of blog broadcasting
information has been outcompeted by
communities like facebook groups or subreddits,
where interaction is many-to-many,
typically much faster response and
more incentive to comment(likes, karma, scores).
reply