That's enough CO2 to make 22.7 billion metric tons of cellulose per year, or ~2.8 tons per capita for Earth's 8.2 billion people. That's too much to to turn it all into furniture or even buildings.
Just for scale how tons of carbon are in an acre or hectare of corn, wheat, or other crop. Being able to say how many farms would need to do this to counter act our release could provide an interesting sanity check.
I’d wager the furniture industry is currently responsible for a significant % of anual deforestation, which as far as I know isn’t regrowing fast enough.
An approach like this could benefit from crops which are not productive for humanity otherwise, but which grows much faster and eats CO2 cheaper than trees.
Does that mean “stop replanting forests?” Absolutely not.
The amount of sigils and occult jargon
math invents on the spot is very weird
in context of most sciences:
imagine creating entire fields/theories
and gaining followers, like a religious sect,
in a field like geometry?
(Author) For specific keywords, yes, technically you could, but it would require making a separate glyph for each word, which would inflate the file size and require a lot of manual effort for no apparent upside. The substituting logic is as rigid as with calts. Unless you had some other idea how to use ligatures?
The Template pack index is going to make
meta-template variadics much easier.
Usually this is prone to cludges like converting
parameters to structs or filtering them with functions holding the pack.
it seems there are 5 different kinds of uses of "...".
1. typename...
2. sizeof...
3. values...
4. T... representing multiple parameters in the formal parameter list.
5. T... for the type of the pack (supporting T...[0], the new feature).
I don't have a big point, I'm just mildly amused. Even with the simplifying new syntax, it took me a while to work through what is what in the example.
I wonder why it's T...[0] and not just T[0]? In parameter lists you need the distinction between "T", a single parameter of pack type, and "T...", multiple parameters supplied from the pack. But I don't see a similar need in an expression.
I think for types you could do without the dots in T...[0], but it mirrors the usage for values (values...[0] is different from (values[0]...). So consistency I guess.
the one-to-many model of blog broadcasting
information has been outcompeted by
communities like facebook groups or subreddits,
where interaction is many-to-many,
typically much faster response and
more incentive to comment(likes, karma, scores).
Ethics, regulations, patient privacy.
Generally what is done is clinical trials and
research on model animals, that of course
is much cheaper to experiment as
first stage before human trials.
Mostly because I just wanted to understand a bit more how these things work. Using abstraction in the form of magic keywords gets the job done (sometimes, but not always) but is almost useless for your understanding.
And I think that the understanding can be very useful even when you use the magic words.
reply