His response is typical. He denies saying things which can easily be disproved. He makes basic factual errors and in the same sentence validates most of the criticism in this thread:
"Cappuccino. That's something built on top of Sproutcore, right? No need to get any deeper than that."
Of course, Cappuccino isn't built on Sproutcore, but even if it was this sentence illustrates the fact that David has long ago made decisions about what he perceives to be the state of javascript frameworks, and isn't interested in anything other than those opinions, however baseless those opinions may be.
"cloverfield" is David Mark, FYI -- it seems someone went and pointed him here.
I noticed in several parts in his response, he's trying to claim credit for aspects of jQuery's development -- something that I think most people would find patently ridiculous. Given David's recent threats, if I were Resig, I'd be tempted to start using the word "defamation" and tell David to put up some evidence or shut up.
"Cappuccino. That's something built on top of Sproutcore, right? No need to get any deeper than that."
Of course, Cappuccino isn't built on Sproutcore, but even if it was this sentence illustrates the fact that David has long ago made decisions about what he perceives to be the state of javascript frameworks, and isn't interested in anything other than those opinions, however baseless those opinions may be.